🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <01bbc3ab$4a655740$6c98d9c7@default>, "Thunder-chicken" <Where_ever_you_go@there_you_are!> wrote:
>
>
>Patrick Weaver <zym...@usit.net> wrote in article
><32721F...@usit.net>...
>> JRider wrote:
>> are eaten by the more experienced. So listen and learn or get eaten. The
>> only way to survive in the information age is to avoid notice. A
>> shoplifting conviction is something you carry until you're eighteen and
>> sometimes longer than that. If you're over eighteen what are you going
>> to do when your employer asks "have you ever been convicted of a crime".
>> The records are becoming more and more availible, lying doesn't work any
>> more. I've had employers check my credit rating, police record,
>> landlords, employment history, and education records. My records and
>> concience are clean. How about yours? And how long will they stay that
>> way?
>> 
>
>        You are totally off the point.  The original poster wasn't shoplifting
> or
>even stealing, he just didn't speak up when BB undercharged him.  If it had
>been reversed and he was overcharged and not noticed, do you think BB would
>have hunted him done to refund it, HELL NO!!!!  They would have screwed him
>just as soon as look at him.  And they will screw you!  

You are right on the company level, and it wouldn't be right.  BUT, there's a 
difference between a cashier missing a mismarked item, and the company 
deliberately mismarking that item.

My posts were less directed at the individual who was undercharged, and didn't 
notice it until later, and more at the individual(s) that advocated deliberate 
theft.

--Mike