Article View: alt.games.wing-commander
Article #6Re: WC3: Fave parts....
From: mat... Matuse
Date: Sat, 27 May 1995 00:00
Date: Sat, 27 May 1995 00:00
21 lines
1645 bytes
1645 bytes
In article <3pmibd$q...@agate.berkeley.edu> mxhe...@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Michael X. Heyeck) writes: >: WC2 - Epee - good gun but almost no armor. > >Gotta agree. Someone else vilified the Crossbow, and I have to retort by >saying that the Crossbow was 10x better than the Broadsword, and no way >was it the "worst." I adored the Broadsword, a superior bomber. Nearly invulnerable because of its 3 turrets, and mammoth amount of shielding, it was used and meant to be a strike bomber. On the other hand, You are constantly being assigned to escort missions flying a crossbow, and it just does NOT hack it for those missions because of its total lack of anything even aproximating a long range gun, and a complete lag of both flight speed and thrusters. And then there is the fact that 3 mass drivers and 2 neutron guns drain *all* of your gun power with a single shot...I gave up using full guns on the crossbow, even if you hit, unless the target was a stealth fighter or a sartha, the thing lived, and then you spend 10 minutes regerating the gun power to try again.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<matuseD987yp.3AM@netcom.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3pe8p7$3bk@hermes.acs.ryerson.ca> <D8sMD8.2Ir@cunews.carleton.ca> <3pmibd$qsf@agate.berkeley.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: mat...@netcom.com (Matuse) Subject: Re: WC3: Fave parts.... Date: 1995/05/27 Message-ID: <matuseD987yp.3AM@netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 103350215 sender: mat...@netcom3.netcom.com references: <3pe8p7$3bk@hermes.acs.ryerson.ca> <D8sMD8.2Ir@cunews.carleton.ca> <3pmibd$qsf@agate.berkeley.edu> organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim,alt.games.wing-commander MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit