Article View: alt.games.wing-commander
Article #541Re: WCIII Graphics
From: Yuli... Yulim Tan
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 00:00
62 lines
3622 bytes
3622 bytes
Of course, WCIII is sometimes slow near very big cap ships (like starbase). but if there are only small fighters, I can have 20 frames per sec. I find the game really fun. You may have to play it a little bit longer. It can take some time to handle correctly your fighter. But once you learned some combat tactics, you will like the game a lot! Snoopy : In article <nhouck.7...@ucla.edu>, nho...@ucla.edu (Noel) wrote: : > I just bought WCIII for the Mac and I must say that I am not impressed : buy the : > graphics. First it only has 256 color graphics which makes the video scenes : > look much worse then they would with 16 bit. Why is the background when : > flying a blue shade and not black, it makes everyhting look muddy. I : think it : > looks ugly, X-Wing is much crisper and nicer to look at (at least on the Mac : > in hi res) and is 100 times more fluid. I can't imagine that the texture : > mapping makes WCIII that much slower vs X-Wing, cause there is usually only 1 : > fighter on the screen at a time anyway. Besides, where is the support for : > QuickDraw 3D, I didn't buy a Mac for nothing? Even in High Res mode, which : > should be 1:1 pixel mapping, the stars/nebulea and such are not in high res, : > and to top it off the game is jerky on an 80Mhz PPC. On an 030 I can : > understand that, but a PPC? All the other flight sims I have are smooth as : > glass! The sound is not very good either, but this one area that X-Wing : > doesn't have an edge up on WCIII. I just got the game and only played it for : > about 15 minutes at it's highest graphics settings, but I would expect more : > from a 4 CD game. It looks like they didn't put much effort into porting it : > to the Mac as far as improving the graphics and sound, the port of X-Wing has : > much improved graphics over the PC version, I would expect the same : here. The : > only saving grace is that the animation is smooth (although low res and in : > crappy 256 color) in the video scenes and the Costuming/Makeup is good. : > : > BTW, I have the demo for X-Wing that I uploaded to AMUG/incoming and : > a.b.mac.games. If anyone wants me to repost it, let me know, but all the : > parts did get there ok, at least on my server. : > : > later- : > Noel : > nho...@ucla.edu : > http://www.seas.ucla.edu/~noel : That's odd...it runs very smoothy on my 7100/66 with only 8 megs of RAM. : What version are you using, and what extensions do you have on? I have : both X-Wing and WC III, and I find WC III to be far superior in all : respects, especially the cutscenes. One last thing:the blue screen means : that you are flying a flight simulator-the background is black in the real : missions. : Evan. : ---------------------------------------- : >>>>>ems...@uncc.campus.mci.net<<<<< : "If you want some : get some : bad enough : take some" : -Snoop Doggy Dogg, "Gz and Hustlas" : -----------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4ekpib$bb5@arcturus.ciril.fr>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<nhouck.7.00129DD7@ucla.edu> <emsauda-2801962335540001@s07-pm02.uncc.campus.mci.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: Yuli...@scinfo.u-nancy.fr (Yulim Tan) Subject: Re: WCIII Graphics Date: 1996/01/30 Message-ID: <4ekpib$bb5@arcturus.ciril.fr> X-Deja-AN: 137239855 references: <nhouck.7.00129DD7@ucla.edu> <emsauda-2801962335540001@s07-pm02.uncc.campus.mci.net> followup-to: alt.games.wing-commander,alt.binaries.mac.games,comp.sys.mac.games.flight-sim organization: Universite Henri Poincare - Nancy (France) mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: alt.games.wing-commander,alt.binaries.mac.games,comp.sys.mac.games.flight-sim Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit