Article View: alt.games.wing-commander
Article #17769Re: Directx 3 "upsets" existing DOS mode games
From: Greg Cisko
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 00:00
48 lines
2746 bytes
2746 bytes
Olin K. McDaniel <omcd...@flosc.net> wrote in article <3352acc2...@news.gabn.net>... > You are absolutely correct, I really don't know what all is going on > with Win95 - neither in its native form nor it its so called DOS, but > the full truth is - I don't feel I really want to know!!!! Fair enough. > I've been perfectly comfortable with DOS, having learned it in all its > twists and turns, plus all the add ins that were available over the > past 12 - 15 years. I will continue to run programs that were/or will > be written for DOS under that OS. As I acquire new programs that > demand Win95, I'll accept their requirements for their OS and use > Win95 for them. The point you (and others) don't seem to want to understand (or are some- how not capable of understanding) if that everything you learned in DOS 6.x can be applied in Win95 (DOS 7). Period... Many people do not seem to understand this. It is quite simple. Win95's MS-DOS mode is the same (functionally) as DOS 6.x. By using a second OS it is *YOU* who are doing the headstands. I am paring down to one OS. Ironic, really :-) As Lloyd Case mentioned in a recent CGW article, DOS games are amazingly simple to setup in Win95. And it is true. Who would have ever thought... > To do all the headstands etc. that you and others keep saying is so > simple to do, and relearn another OS is not a viable alternative for > me. It's that simple. I like to use what I feel comfortable with, > and don't intend to knuckle under to a tidal wave of pressure. It > appears there are plenty of others of us, call us stubborn, hard > headed, or even worse - we yield with great resistance. Fighting all > the way. No offense meant, but I don't have to buy a new car every > year nor a new computer every 6 months, nor a new OS when the old one > does all I can possibly want. > > Guess the flames begin! <vbg> Nope, no flames. Just seriously trying to help you (and others) understand. I normally just pass on these trolls. -- Header address intentionaly scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes. gci...@concentric.net
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01bc4940$97c5f9c0$3968adce@crc3.concentric.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<01bc46e9$2e278f00$02551dcb@COMPUTER1> <33524edf.990813@news.gabn.net> <01bc4912$3e2ff2e0$2568adce@crc3.concentric.net> <3352acc2.22024298@news.gabn.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: "Greg Cisko" <gci...@nOsPaMconcentric.net> Subject: Re: Directx 3 "upsets" existing DOS mode games Date: 1997/04/15 Message-ID: <01bc4940$97c5f9c0$3968adce@crc3.concentric.net> X-Deja-AN: 234842012 References: <01bc46e9$2e278f00$02551dcb@COMPUTER1> <33524edf.990813@news.gabn.net> <01bc4912$3e2ff2e0$2568adce@crc3.concentric.net> <3352acc2.22024298@news.gabn.net> Organization: Concentric Internet Services Newsgroups: alt.games.wing-commander,aus.games,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit