🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <36152d3a....@goodnews.nildram.co.uk>, 0...@zerozero.net
(Brett Gerhardi) wrote:

> On Thu, 1 Oct 1998 18:34:56 +0100, "RichE" <rpe...@globalnet.co.uk>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> >navyg8r wrote in message <6uufh1$sr0$1...@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
> >>simple yes or no question:
> >>
> >>if you see a 3dfx logo on the box of that awesome computer game you are
> >>going to buy, you expect that game to have native 3dfx support (Glide) and
> >>thus, use your voodoo 1/2/SLI or banshee card to its full potential.
> >>
> >>yes or no?
> >>
> >
> >
> >Damn right it should.. D3D sucks. OpenGl sucks. Glide kicks ass. All games
> >should be programed from the ground up to ONLY run on Glide.. Lets face it,
> >if you're getting a 3d game nowadays you can't expect to run it in software
> >even if you've got a 450mhz machine. Why don't developers do the decent
> >thing and go 100% 3dfx.. Imagine how cool games would look and the average
> >FPS would go up about 30%
> Do you work for 3dfx? Ever heard of a monopoly? Do you understand why
> a monopoly is a bad thing?

So I take it you do not support the monopoly of the "PC Compatable", and
own either a Mac, or a Amiga, instead?