🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 24 Oct 1996 21:22:24 -0700, Death Knight <d...@134.net> wrote:

>Eddie wrote:
>> 
>> On 24 Oct 1996 07:57:38 GMT, kim...@bnr.ca (Kimmy Posey) wrote:
>> 
>> >
>> >In article <326f5ede...@news.alt.net>, an38...@anon.penet.fi (Eddie) writes:
>> >|> On Wed, 23 Oct 1996 11:47:41 -0500, Chris Anderson
>> >|> <c...@austin.ibm.com> wrote:
>> >|> [snip]
>> >|> >
>> >|> >We have a term for that kind of "upgrade".  Its called stealing.  Now
>> >
>> >Excellent points snipped
>> >
>> >|>
>> >|> I've never really understood you internet-lurking, moral defenders of
>> >|> justice.  What do you do?  Scour the newsgroups, searching for
>> >|> articles you deem unethical and proceed to scold the author?  BTW your
>> >|> verbal spanking may hold more validity if you did less name-calling (I
>> >|> counted 5 lame-asses alone) and posted your arguments more cogently.
>> >
>> >The original respondent was perfectly rational in his/her statements.
>> >What do you amoral social parasites do, sit around inventing new ways
>> >to avoid work and live off the sweat of honest, law abiding citizens?
>> 
>> yes
>> 
>> >
>> >
>> >|>
>> >|> The few points you did make were rather fallacious: 1) The *very* few
>> >|> people who actually purposely return the wrong merchandize to costumer
>> >|> service desks at computer stores will not significantly effect product
>> >|> pricing.  The mere fact that you're able to get away with it,
>> >|> indicates it's not much of a problem.  2) Why should a guy making
>> >|> minimum wage with no benefits give a shit what costumers get away with
>> >|> in the store he or she's employed at?  And why would this effect their
>> >|> ability to help the costumers find the products they need?
>> >
>> >No Sap Club, *YOUR* points are absolutely fallacious.  1) Shop-lifting
>> >(which is what we are talking about here) costs American companies
>> >BILLIONS of dollars every year.  If you think it doesn't affect consumer
>> >prices, you're stupid. 2) A person employed for minimum wage should care
>> >because its right to do so.  He or she is getting payed to care moron.
>> >I worked for minimum wage to get through school and I gave it 100%.  If
>> >I had caught some miserable loser trying to steal from my company you can
>> >bet I would have narced him out pronto.
>> >
>> 
>> hey, it's Duddly Doright in a dress!
>> 
>> >|>
>> >|> Finally, the people who posted here were trying to help others, who
>> >|> may be financially challenged, acquire some measly scraps the huge
>> >|> conglomerate companies drop from their table.  So why don't you get
>> >|> off your moral high horse, quite scouring the internet for flaim-bait,
>> >|> (such as this article I'm sure)  just read the stuff you're interested
>> >|> in, and leave us lame-ass-bastards alone?
>> >
>> >Financially challenged ?!  What planet are you from.  Here on earth we
>> >just call 'em thieves.  If your mama had whipped you regular as a child
>> >you might have a little respect for those people sittin' on that moral
>> >high horse.
>> >
>> >Stop sittin' on you rump watchin' Beavis and Butthead and get a job.
>> >
>> >KimmyD
>> 
>> Is that why your so self-righteous?  Because your mama beat the shit
>> out of you when you were a child?  I'm sorry.
>
>It looks my comment on cowardice hit the mark...
>
>I guess you don't want to anonymize your address so people can't find the rock 
>you live under.
>
>--Mike   whose parents did not strike him, yet still knows right from wrong
>            unlike Eddie...

Actually I anonymize my address so self-righteous fanatics don't mail
bomb me in the name of moral justice.  And BTW it still allows for
people to reach me by email.