🚀 go-pugleaf

Mattias Hembruch wrote:


>>>>>>Do you think of Prophecy and Secret Ops as different games or as
>>>>>>Secret Ops as an add-on for Prophecy?
>>>>>
>>>>>I guess I'd have to say it's really more of an add-on; there weren't a
>>>>>whole lot of new resources we created for SO - a couple of ship as
>>>>>opposed to the dozens for Prophecy, no cinematics, etc. So from our
>>>>>perspective it was a case of utilizing material we'd already created
>>>>>instead of creating a whole new project.
>>>>
>>>>;-)
>>>>;-)
>>>>;-)
>>>>;-)
>>>>;-)
>>>>;-)
>>>
>>>*tumbleweed*
>>
>>Probably because your attempts at "I told you so" are based on one man's 
>>admitted opinion. Sean's points are reasoning that's already been 
>>covered. Merely means there's one more person who sees the game as you do.
> 
> 
> I see.. Now the word of one of the authors isn't canonical either.. You guys
> are a hoot :-)

It's nothing against Sean, Mattias. Being a graphic designer myself, I 
can (and do) appreciate the work he's done. However, his comment is 
clearly an opinion ("I guess..."), and his reasoning is but one of the 
several aspects which differentiate an add-on from a stand-alone game. 
That's not to say that I don't respect his opinion. But I continue to 
believe that there are more aspects which logically support WCSO being a 
stand-alone game than support it being merely an add-on.

-- 

*** Remove the DELETE from my address to reply ***

======================================================
  Kevin Scholl                http://www.ksscholl.com/
  kscholl@comcast.DELETE.net
------------------------------------------------------
  Information Architecture, Web Design and Development
------------------------------------------------------
  We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of
  the dreams...
======================================================