🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:30:49 +0100, "distant"
<distant5939@hottttttmail.com> wrote:

>
>"DBD_Sandman" <chris@canddcomputers.com> wrote in message
>news:bi2m9i$qr8$1@news.gate.net...
>> Don't it just suck that you will have to pay a monthly subscription fee
>just
>> to play World of Warcraft on line. I can see where the company is coming
>> from since they are providing the servers to play on but why start now
>with
>> the best game you have come out with.
>
> Surely your best game is the right game to start this policy with.
>
Sure but first you have to hand over the starting price, 
how do you know it doesnt suck ? Magazins ?? Dont be ridiculous.

>>So what does everyone else think? Do
>> think WoW should be free and possibly ask for donations to play online or
>> should they have a flat monthly fee whether you play the game once a month
>> or 24-7?
>
> Who cares what we think. Blizzard is a company. They want cash. They'll go
>for the best way of getting it.
>
I once saw a friend playing a game.. camelot something.. he waited for
a mana refill or similar for 15 minutes doing nothing. What kind of
game is this ?  As you cant TEST games like this b4, a monthly fee
would be the only way to go.

And YESS, i will never forget Bethesda Software with Daggerfall.
Excellent previews, a rpg game released while anything past
hour 4 wasnt programmed yet. Amazing.

Another isssue is graphics. Ever saw an mmorg with gfx, that doesnt
complety suck ?

I played Diablo 2 for a very long time, so it will be very expensive
even without a package price.. if its good.

tom