🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.warcraft
Article #88777

Re: WoW Pay to Play

#88777
From: cae... Caecina
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 19:40
18 lines
1482 bytes
>    I can't believe that people would quibble over paying $10.00/ month for
>this.  I'm by no means rich... lower middle class really, but this is about
>what you'd pay for a movie and a coke.

Good point, but some people don't see a movie every month. There's also the
price of the game itself, which is tied to the $10 a month subscription.


>People don't balk at paying $10.00
>for 2 hours of entertainment, but complain when they pay the same amount for
>something that will likely entertain them for upwards of 20-100 hours a
>month?!?

I do think, however, that Blizzard should offer one free month, or a set number
of hours, in order for the prospective subscriber to decide whether or not it's
worth it. $10 a month, for one game, on top of the price of the game itself, is
too much for some people, especially if they've got other considerations.
(school, rent, family, all the above, etc..)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <20030823154041.28426.00000586@mb-m18.aol.com>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!lnsnews.lns.cornell.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!ngpeer.news.aol.com!audrey-m2.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
References: <3f4720e6@shknews01>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!lnsnews.lns.cornell.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!ngpeer.news.aol.com!audrey-m2.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 18
X-Admin: ne...@aol.com
From: cae...@aol.com (Caecina)
Newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft
Date: 23 Aug 2003 19:40:41 GMT
References: <3f4720e6@shknews01>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject: Re: WoW Pay to Play
Message-ID: <20030823154041.28426.00000586@mb-m18.aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit