Article View: alt.games.warcraft
Article #59Warcraft: Better serial games with 'hi-speed' port?
From: depa... just passing through
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 1995 00:00
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 1995 00:00
29 lines
1726 bytes
1726 bytes
Here's something interesting for people who are using the direct serial link option, and some questions for Blizzard support. I was using Warcraft 1.21 with two serial ports, both sides with the DLINK option, 9600. This worked OK, but the play was often quite jerky -- mouse response was pretty bad, especially in the setup screens and also while playing, if the other guy was doing a lot of stuff. I broke down and bought a couple of 'high-speed' serial ports, the kind with 16550 UARTS in them. (These have a bigger I/O buffer.) Somewhat to my disappointment, direct-link play was still jerky in the same manner. Maybe a little less. Today, I tried a direct-link without the DLINK option, and much to my surprise, the jerkiness was almost completely gone. So, what does the DLINK option actually do? I think I did try w/o the DLINK option when I had regular boring serial ports, and then the game would crash, but I'm not sure. I'd just like to suggest to serial-link players that they try 'high-speed' serial ports w/o DLINK, but I'm also curious what the DLINK option actually did, why it made play somewhat jerky, and why a 16550 UART would make the DLINK option unnecessary, if it ever was necessary. -- Rich (depa...@netcom.com)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<departedDCoCpF.HLv@netcom.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: depa...@netcom.com (just passing through) Subject: Warcraft: Better serial games with 'hi-speed' port? Date: 1995/08/02 Message-ID: <departedDCoCpF.HLv@netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 107277685 sender: depa...@netcom8.netcom.com organization: Liver, kidneys, intestines, the usual ... newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.warcraft MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit