Article View: alt.games.warcraft
Article #353172Re: Lightspeed constant...
From: Jason C. Wenger
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 00:00
38 lines
2537 bytes
2537 bytes
> Charles Han wrote: > > If you find this thread ininteresting, feel free to not read the > following question: > > I have basically no background in this field (besides an 8th grade GT > science education), but a few days ago, this thread had an interesting > discussion about approaching light-speed. As I recall, it was made > apparent that, as an object approaches lightspeed, its mass approaches > infinity. Doesn't the Law of Conservation of Matter prohibit any gain > or loss of mass? > > I know that the question just might seem foolishly simple for some, and > the answer may just go completely over my head, but could someone please > answer with a simple reply? Thanks a lot. I believe that in very special cases, especially nuclear reactions, (fusion reactions in particular???), that mass will change and become VERY slightly smaller (.00001% or something like that). Thus, scientists have assumed that a VERY SMALL amount of direct mass to energy conversion has taken place. Can anyone back me up on this? +------------------------------------------------+ | Jason C. Wenger www.clinton.net/~jwenger/ | | 'Thursday' on Kali jwe...@clinton.net | | Illegitimi no carborundum jwe...@juno.com | +------------------------------------------------+ | So... So you think you can tell | | Heaven from Hell? Blue skies from pain? | | Can you tell a green field | | From a cold steel rail? | | A smile from a veil? | | Do you think you can tell? | | "Wish You Were Here" - Pink Floyd | +------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32A72439.3C05@clinton.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<574e67$1hb@mippet.ci.com.au> <01bbe156$56e4e8a0$2ddcdbcd@maxkilms.nidlink.com> <32A4E35B.3347@pop.erols.com> <32A62F6B.5F90@hg.uleth.ca> <32A6646B.1801@fsl.com.sg>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: "Jason C. Wenger" <jwe...@clinton.net> Subject: Re: Lightspeed constant... Date: 1996/12/05 Message-ID: <32A72439.3C05@clinton.net> X-Deja-AN: 202547138 references: <574e67$1hb@mippet.ci.com.au> <01bbe156$56e4e8a0$2ddcdbcd@maxkilms.nidlink.com> <32A4E35B.3347@pop.erols.com> <32A62F6B.5F90@hg.uleth.ca> <32A6646B.1801@fsl.com.sg> to: David Kong <dk...@fsl.com.sg> mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: jwe...@clinton.net newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,comp.multimedia,comp.graphics.animation,alt.games.doom,alt.games.descent,alt.games.warcraft,comp.graphics,comp.graphics.animation,alt.fan.bill-gates,comp.os.os2.mi x-mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; U) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit