🚀 go-pugleaf

Alexey I. Medvedev wrote:
> 
> Bob Bell (bb...@voicenet.com) wrote:
> :       About tachyons... that term just describes _theoretical_
> : particles travelling faster than the speed of light.  Under Eisteinian
> : complex, and _at_ the speed of light, things become undefined.
> 
> : HOWEVER, it could still be possible for tachyons to exist.  They would
> But can we detect it?
> Can that type of mather interact with particles?
> 
> Or it is information field (as some thought?)?
> 
> :           - Bob Bell
> :           bb...@voicenet.com
>                                 Alexey(Malx)
> 
> ---------------------------------------   \
>  @   Word is not a color, but a picture.   \\
>  V  To understand it you must draw it by yourself.
> -----------------------------------------  ////
>  mail-to: mal...@cad.polytech.kiev.ua --  ///
>  http://194.44.128.129/~malvin/       -  //

	ok, say you were traveling the same speed as a light particle. then you
became faster than the light particle. wouldn't you just run into the
next light particle. then the next, then the next...  How does this have
anyrelation to time travel? 
	I think that what einstein stated was that if you ran away from a clock
at the speed of light, the clock would stay still. if you ran faster
than the speed of light you would run into a new light particle that
took the place of the light particle you just saw.  so if you went
faster than the speed of light, all you would see would be a gray void
of light.  I don't know where people got the idea that if you went
faster than the speed of light you would go back in time?!?
	but i'm just some 16 year old kid, so what do i know...