🚀 go-pugleaf

On 13/03/2016 1:23 AM, Lewis wrote:
> In message <56e411c1$0$52718$b1db1813$e2fc...@news.astraweb.com>
>    | || ||| ||||| || | <|||||||||||||||||||||> wrote:

>> I found too many alts , enough to do a full profession mini economy a
>> pain. Consider that may not enjoy more alts/mains. The time to get a new
>> one up and useful is usually no way worth for me . Mostly because
>> somehow I feel obligated. I can't leave one to rot once I have it so
>> none gets totally kitted out.
>
> Kitting them out is trivial though.
>
> As little as I play I have well over a hundred followers, all are at
> ilvl 675 except for the brand new ones this week who are not levl 100
> yet.
>
> I get a new lvl 100 follower every week from the Inn and by the next
> week that follower is almost always lvl 100.

  I was talking about the actual characters.  By armory they are around 
650-ish, not played for a year. Oh hey, they are still in their guilds 
who were punting inactives back then, must not be very active now.

I could have 25 active followers with bunker and 15-20 inactive per 
character on rotation for quest needs equals 250+ back then. Before 
ships and Tannan Jungle and flying.

>
> The Dwarven bunker provides plenty of item upgrades for them.
>
>> No WOW still, every time I go to start it just seems like too much work
>> to start again. I tend to dredge out 20 year old games and replay them,
>> just as interesting to fill in a few hours mostly.
>
> Blizzard just patched Dialbo II. Yes, I said Diablo II.

Now playing Total Annihilation from 1997 and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri 
from 1999. 400 fighter airfleets don't get bogged down on a modern 
processor unlike a 400MHz processor back then :-)  Some games refuse to 
run. Others take 20 years in their stride. Shows how well programmed 
some were.

XCOM2 looks good to try because it is turn based.
The Division was looking good,  a bit WOW-ish to start.
But it only came out March 8 and there are already streamers at 40ish 
being Uber at everybody so NOPE.