🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:29:47 +0200, "Peter T." <pinoc10@hotmail.cum>
wrote:

>Den 15-10-2014 20:19, Catriona R skrev:
>>
>> Curious what others think of them! I've gone over my main server
>> characters, two accounts so 22 total. Six weren't affected, leaving
>> 16, and the hitrate isn't good, considering Blizzard repeatedly said
>> they're supposed to feel like "our characters but better"
>> (paraphrasing).
>
>I really dont care.  Well.  I see my chars very close on the char 
>selection screen.  But in the game I'm always zoomed out at max range so 
>my own char (which I always see from behind!) and other chars are just 
>grouped pixels.  Better or worse models dont affect my gameplay or 
>experience.

You're lucky then! I zoom out while playing, sure, but I like to make
my charcters look good, transmog, and my own choice of face, hair etc,
I always pick a race/class/gender/face/hair combo that I like as a
unit. Only, a lot of my characters no longer look like my characters.

>Honestly.  I dont see any reason for the new models.  Its like Blizzard 
>says "hey!  We can make a detailed moustache because we can!!!".  you 
>cant see all the details anyway unless you play the game from a 
>first-person point.  But I'm sure there are loads of peeps around who 
>needs to upgrade their video card just because the moustache has become 
>more detailed and therefore demand more powah due to the new gfx engine.

Well, it's done because when you look at a pandaren, and then look at
the worst of the old models (tauren and human male come to mind), the
difference is enormous, and a lot of us wanted our older races to look
as good as the pandaren. Just a shame a lot of them don't; a key part
of the process was supposed to be keeping the look and feel of our old
characters, and they just plain failed at that in a lot of cases.

>When that is said; my gnome lock's new face looks pretty dumb.  I 
>wouldnt allow my gnome in any raid because he looks like a dizzy 
>neanderthal on a heroine trip. :)

Haha :-)