🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.warcraft
Article #350745

Re: Is it worth bothering with the Legendary Cloak at this point?

#350745
From: Cryptoengineer
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:50
46 lines
3762 bytes
Catriona R <catrion...@totalise.co.uk> wrote in news:ca2ki8Ffi0U1
@mid.individual.net:

> 
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:00:43 -0500, Cryptoengineer
> <pete...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>John Gordon <gor...@panix.com> wrote in
>>news:m1h1i2$9hd$1...@reader1.panix.com: 
>>
>>> In <6b67006a-288a-4307...@googlegroups.com>
>>> pete...@gmail.com writes: 
>>> 
>>>> Fwiw, I finished the 4 LFR raids which yield Titan Runestones, with
>>>> 7. I have to get another 5. If I'm correct that two bosses are
>>>> guaranteed drops, it's possible that I'll get the cloak just before
>>>> the expansion drops and closes off the quest line. We'll see.
>>> 
>>> The expansion is still another four or five weeks away, isn't it? 
>>> Plenty of time to get your cloak.
>>> 
>>
>>Yeah, probably. I have 7 TRs at this point - at worst it will take
>>me 3 weeks to get them (though LFR may be a ghosttown).
>>
>>Then I'll have to find a group that wants to do the Celestials, while
>>the new stuff is all around them...
> 
> Shouldn't be too hard, the new group finder will be in, so you can use
> that if nobody on your realm wants a shot (and people will be on the
> isle, since Ordos will be open for non-cloak people for the first
> time, so I'm sure at least some will bother with the Celestials while
> they pass by)

Today I did my first post-drop Titan Runestone runs. If you recall, I
was concerned that with the end of the Black Prince's buff, I would take
up to 3 weeks to gather them all.

In fact, I picked up the 5 I needed off of 6 boss encounters, none of
which were guarenteed drops. Others I chatted with in raid reported
similar results. The drop rate is now *very* high.

If you have toons on any step of the legendary cloak quest, it may
still be acheivable.

pt
Technical Details
Message-ID: <XnsA3C782A97CF23melchizdek@216.166.97.131>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!bc9ni30861igb.0!nntp.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <XnsA3C16401D2815melchizdek@216.166.97.131> <c9nj71F4n0fU1@mid.individual.net> <c9pkmqFkl1hU1@mid.individual.net> <XnsA3C2EA72710C9melchizdek@216.166.97.131> <c9s7ccFa93aU1@mid.individual.net> <XnsA3C374FED77CAmelchizdek@216.166.97.131> <6b67006a-288a-4307-85e9-7d7f50e6590c@googlegroups.com> <m1h1i2$9hd$1@reader1.panix.com> <XnsA3C58E8103D16melchizdek@216.166.97.131> <ca2ki8Ffi0U1@mid.individual.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.236.28.74 with SMTP id f50mr9539445yha.7.1413391855594;        Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: alt.games.warcraft@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.107.19.11 with SMTP id b11ls268383ioj.17.gmail; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.42.192.131 with SMTP id dq3mr9321478icb.3.1413391854511;        Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!bc9ni30861igb.0!nntp.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:50:53 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft
Subject: Re: Is it worth bothering with the Legendary Cloak at this point?
From: Cryptoengineer <pete...@gmail.com>
References: <XnsA3C16401D2815melchizdek@216.166.97.131> <c9nj71F4n0fU1@mid.individual.net> <c9pkmqFkl1hU1@mid.individual.net> <XnsA3C2EA72710C9melchizdek@216.166.97.131> <c9s7ccFa93aU1@mid.individual.net> <XnsA3C374FED77CAmelchizdek@216.166.97.131> <6b67006a-288a-4307-85e9-7d7f50e6590c@googlegroups.com> <m1h1i2$9hd$1@reader1.panix.com> <XnsA3C58E8103D16melchizdek@216.166.97.131> <ca2ki8Ffi0U1@mid.individual.net>
Organization: Dis
Message-ID: <XnsA3C782A97CF23melchizdek@216.166.97.131>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:50:54 -0500
Lines: 46
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-iTPDj6GjS7o5d/tBGkGM4VNrFyalXkYhWyqA5jRvg3t+NOYQQguNJeQTqB7s7hOAgKRv2MQZPpv5xuq!JtIgYlOK9CdpxukniELn0Fm1TpXc3uCMqknHmmu+B1OJRvbp67dnfDIdXEig2m2i99ZY
X-Complaints-To: ab...@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3219
X-Original-Bytes: 3157
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit