🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.warcraft
Article #340968

Re: Glyphing a prot warrior

#340968
From: Shiflet
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:15
25 lines
2250 bytes
"Urbin" <urbin@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
news:slrnip0umd.lhl.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net...

> Sounds nice, I'll make sure I take that talent.

Oh definitely, it's a must have for prots.

>>  Also, unless this has changed, the glyph that lets Sunder Armor
>>  affect a second target(major glyph, I think?) affects Devastate as well.
>
> Damn, that of course brings me right back to my dilemma because I wasn't
> sure which major glpyh I should pick: The one increasing the Cleave 
> targets
> by one or the one increasing the Sunder targets by one :-)

Cleave is better. You can take the Sunder one eventually, but you want 
Cleave for sure.

> Anyway, for the time being, other than on bosses, I use Cleave much more
> often then Sunder, so I went with the Glyph of Cleave.

Devastate makes sundering a lot more pleasant, as it's a reasonably hard 
hitting attack in addition to applying Sunder.
 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <impuce$ok8$1@dont-email.me>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <slrniosofc.i8j.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <imlntv$kp7$1@dont-email.me> <slrnip0tjn.lhl.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <imptlq$hd4$1@dont-email.me> <slrnip0umd.lhl.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Shiflet" <rshi...@charter.net>
Newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft
Subject: Re: Glyphing a prot warrior
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:15:22 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <impuce$ok8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <slrniosofc.i8j.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <imlntv$kp7$1@dont-email.me> <slrnip0tjn.lhl.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <imptlq$hd4$1@dont-email.me> <slrnip0umd.lhl.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net>
Injection-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:19:26 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="KtTVmTQG0sd9JOtdABk9tA"; logging-data="25224"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+z0MkD4NQ5c0+omjERNDECq9d2wZxw+OM="
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110327-0, 03/27/2011), Outbound message
Cancel-Lock: sha1:X7tOmQxM/9c5A+MsD8yBGosuudE=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit