Article View: alt.games.warcraft
Article #340953Re: Glyphing a prot warrior
From: Urbin
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:41
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:41
36 lines
2385 bytes
2385 bytes
On 28 Mar 2011 13:15:59 GMT, Neil Cerutti wrote: > On 2011-03-28, Urbin <urbin@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > Damn, that of course brings me right back to my dilemma because > > I wasn't sure which major glpyh I should pick: The one > > increasing the Cleave targets by one or the one increasing the > > Sunder targets by one :-) > > I think Sunder is the clear winner for tanking, as it generates > lots of threat. I know, but so far I haven't been using it on trash pulls (feel free to tell me if I should; I am uncertain about it but so far have been holding aggro on most (though not always all) mobs withouth it; anyway, making sure I cast it on all mobs in a trash pull will be tricky to keep track of...). And on most bosses at low levels there are no adds, so having it hit a second target is not so important... > > Anyway, for the time being, other than on bosses, I use Cleave > > much more often then Sunder, so I went with the Glyph of > > Cleave. > > ...but then if you aren't finding Sunder necessary then glyphing > for it would be a mistake. In the end, that was my reasoning for the time being. When I get a second glyph slot I'll probably take it up over the other majors, though they sound very attractive, too. Cheers Urbin -- Dun Morogh-EU (PvE) | Juran (65), Druid Urbin (85), Hunter | Surana (70), Mage | Greeta (64), Rogue Mymule (81), Warlock | Kordosch (75), Deathknight | Gera (26), Paladin Sunh (80), Priest | Taalas (78), Shaman | Vargal (25), Warrior
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slrnip17h8.bir.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<slrniosofc.i8j.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <imlntv$kp7$1@dont-email.me> <slrnip0tjn.lhl.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <imptlq$hd4$1@dont-email.me> <slrnip0umd.lhl.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <8vbg0fF87aU5@mid.individual.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Urbin <urbin@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft Subject: Re: Glyphing a prot warrior Date: 28 Mar 2011 14:41:44 GMT Lines: 36 Message-ID: <slrnip17h8.bir.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> References: <slrniosofc.i8j.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <imlntv$kp7$1@dont-email.me> <slrnip0tjn.lhl.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <imptlq$hd4$1@dont-email.me> <slrnip0umd.lhl.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <8vbg0fF87aU5@mid.individual.net> X-Trace: individual.net Pb3k0AyFXM1OZWt86GhzgQbFy/vNbDgZtyuDY44TBJJr0WH7g7 Cancel-Lock: sha1:AU4QXBNFewWgNtK5Dnoi1cxIq2Q= User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (SunOS) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit