🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.warcraft
Article #340953

Re: Glyphing a prot warrior

#340953
From: Urbin
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:41
36 lines
2385 bytes
On 28 Mar 2011 13:15:59 GMT, Neil Cerutti wrote:
>  On 2011-03-28, Urbin <urbin@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> > Damn, that of course brings me right back to my dilemma because
> > I wasn't sure which major glpyh I should pick: The one
> > increasing the Cleave targets by one or the one increasing the
> > Sunder targets by one :-)
> 
>  I think Sunder is the clear winner for tanking, as it generates
>  lots of threat.

I know, but so far I haven't been using it on trash pulls (feel free to tell
me if I should; I am uncertain about it but so far have been holding aggro
on most (though not always all) mobs withouth it; anyway, making sure I cast
it on all mobs in a trash pull will be tricky to keep track of...). And on
most bosses at low levels there are no adds, so having it hit a second
target is not so important...

> > Anyway, for the time being, other than on bosses, I use Cleave
> > much more often then Sunder, so I went with the Glyph of
> > Cleave.
> 
>  ...but then if you aren't finding Sunder necessary then glyphing
>  for it would be a mistake.

In the end, that was my reasoning for the time being. When I get a second
glyph slot I'll probably take it up over the other majors, though they sound
very attractive, too.

Cheers
Urbin

-- 
Dun Morogh-EU (PvE)                               | Juran  (65), Druid
Urbin  (85), Hunter  | Surana   (70), Mage        | Greeta (64), Rogue
Mymule (81), Warlock | Kordosch (75), Deathknight | Gera   (26), Paladin
Sunh   (80), Priest  | Taalas   (78), Shaman      | Vargal (25), Warrior
Technical Details
Message-ID: <slrnip17h8.bir.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
References: <slrniosofc.i8j.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <imlntv$kp7$1@dont-email.me> <slrnip0tjn.lhl.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <imptlq$hd4$1@dont-email.me> <slrnip0umd.lhl.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <8vbg0fF87aU5@mid.individual.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Urbin <urbin@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft
Subject: Re: Glyphing a prot warrior
Date: 28 Mar 2011 14:41:44 GMT
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <slrnip17h8.bir.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net>
References: <slrniosofc.i8j.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <imlntv$kp7$1@dont-email.me> <slrnip0tjn.lhl.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <imptlq$hd4$1@dont-email.me> <slrnip0umd.lhl.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <8vbg0fF87aU5@mid.individual.net>
X-Trace: individual.net Pb3k0AyFXM1OZWt86GhzgQbFy/vNbDgZtyuDY44TBJJr0WH7g7
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AU4QXBNFewWgNtK5Dnoi1cxIq2Q=
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (SunOS)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit