Article View: alt.games.warcraft
Article #340848Re: Threat to authenticators?
From: Urbin
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:16
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:16
51 lines
3112 bytes
3112 bytes
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:45:46 GMT, Ashen Shugar wrote: > I think it was Urbin <urbin@invalid.invalid> that wrote something > like... > > >On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:09:06 +0000, Catriona R wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:03:26 +0000 (UTC), ScratchMonkey > >> <ScratchMonk...@sewingwitch.com> wrote: > >> > >> >http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/rsa-warns-customers-targeted-attacks- > >> >wake-hack-031811 > >> > >> Guess not: > >> > >> "The Blizzard Authenticators are based off modified Vasco tokens. I'm > >> sorry to hear about RSA's troubles, but it will not affect the > >> Blizzard Authenticator." > >> > >> http://blue.mmo-champion.com/topic/164619/rsa-compromise-concerns-about-authenticators > > > >Hm, famous last words or justified consolation? > > Well, it sounds like the Blizzard authenticators use a somewhat > different algorithm to the RSA ones, so nothing about the RSA stuff > would give a direct method to hacking Blizzard authenticators. The > only possible problem that I could see would be if the RSA stuff isn't > actually properly designed. A properly designed encryption method is > secure even if people know exactly how it works. If however, the RSA > stuff *isn'* properly designed and the Blizzard authenticators use a > similarly improper design, then knowing how the RSA stuff is weak > could show someone how the Blizzard authenticators are probably weak > and thus how to "hack" them. > > RSA's comments suggest that their design is probably designed properly > and their suggestions to be careful are just ones that everyone should > be doing anyway all the time to avoid man in the middle attacks that > circumvent the protection from having an authenticator. Oh, I agree with your conclusion. It was more the wording of the blue poster that prompte my post. The "but it will not affect the X" sounds a lot like "but there is nothing to worry about" often heard in disaster scenarios before people grasp the full potential of what occurred. Cheers Urbin -- Dun Morogh-EU (PvE) | Juran (65), Druid Urbin (85), Hunter | Surana (70), Mage | Greeta (64), Rogue Mymule (81), Warlock | Kordosch (75), Deathknight | Gera (26), Paladin Sunh (80), Priest | Taalas (77), Shaman | Vargal (14), Warrior
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slrnioe9bd.gf8.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<Xns9EAD8EFCB92E2scratchmonkey@85.214.73.210> <8ukkapFbvcU1@mid.individual.net> <slrniodvaq.p9k.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <4d871ae8.894431@News.Individual.NET>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Urbin <urbin@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft Subject: Re: Threat to authenticators? Date: 21 Mar 2011 10:16:13 GMT Lines: 51 Message-ID: <slrnioe9bd.gf8.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> References: <Xns9EAD8EFCB92E2scratchmonkey@85.214.73.210> <8ukkapFbvcU1@mid.individual.net> <slrniodvaq.p9k.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <4d871ae8.894431@News.Individual.NET> X-Trace: individual.net F4uDMrhnzy7Iv4lISqvw/gmRJLK7WqWOr6Wa/oN+6HQzR0jTn8 Cancel-Lock: sha1:fcooDDXXYbeXnEFcgmTwmRMtxpU= User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (SunOS) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit