🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.warcraft
Article #340848

Re: Threat to authenticators?

#340848
From: Urbin
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:16
51 lines
3112 bytes
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:45:46 GMT, Ashen Shugar wrote:
>  I think it was Urbin <urbin@invalid.invalid> that wrote something
>  like...
> 
> >On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:09:06 +0000, Catriona R wrote:
> >> 
> >>  On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:03:26 +0000 (UTC), ScratchMonkey
> >> <ScratchMonk...@sewingwitch.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/rsa-warns-customers-targeted-attacks-
> >> >wake-hack-031811
> >> 
> >>  Guess not: 
> >> 
> >>  "The Blizzard Authenticators are based off modified Vasco tokens. I'm
> >>  sorry to hear about RSA's troubles, but it will not affect the
> >>  Blizzard Authenticator."
> >> 
> >>  http://blue.mmo-champion.com/topic/164619/rsa-compromise-concerns-about-authenticators
> >
> >Hm, famous last words or justified consolation?
> 
>  Well, it sounds like the Blizzard authenticators use a somewhat
>  different algorithm to the RSA ones, so nothing about the RSA stuff
>  would give a direct method to hacking Blizzard authenticators.  The
>  only possible problem that I could see would be if the RSA stuff isn't
>  actually properly designed.  A properly designed encryption method is
>  secure even if people know exactly how it works.  If however, the RSA
>  stuff *isn'* properly designed and the Blizzard authenticators use a
>  similarly improper design, then knowing how the RSA stuff is weak
>  could show someone how the Blizzard authenticators are probably weak
>  and thus how to "hack" them.
> 
>  RSA's comments suggest that their design is probably designed properly
>  and their suggestions to be careful are just ones that everyone should
>  be doing anyway all the time to avoid man in the middle attacks that
>  circumvent the protection from having an authenticator.

Oh, I agree with your conclusion. It was more the wording of the blue poster
that prompte my post. The "but it will not affect the X" sounds a lot like
"but there is nothing to worry about" often heard in disaster scenarios
before people grasp the full potential of what occurred.

Cheers
Urbin

-- 
Dun Morogh-EU (PvE)                               | Juran  (65), Druid
Urbin  (85), Hunter  | Surana   (70), Mage        | Greeta (64), Rogue
Mymule (81), Warlock | Kordosch (75), Deathknight | Gera   (26), Paladin
Sunh   (80), Priest  | Taalas   (77), Shaman      | Vargal (14), Warrior
Technical Details
Message-ID: <slrnioe9bd.gf8.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
References: <Xns9EAD8EFCB92E2scratchmonkey@85.214.73.210> <8ukkapFbvcU1@mid.individual.net> <slrniodvaq.p9k.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <4d871ae8.894431@News.Individual.NET>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Urbin <urbin@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft
Subject: Re: Threat to authenticators?
Date: 21 Mar 2011 10:16:13 GMT
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <slrnioe9bd.gf8.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net>
References: <Xns9EAD8EFCB92E2scratchmonkey@85.214.73.210> <8ukkapFbvcU1@mid.individual.net> <slrniodvaq.p9k.urbin@stinky-local.trash.net> <4d871ae8.894431@News.Individual.NET>
X-Trace: individual.net F4uDMrhnzy7Iv4lISqvw/gmRJLK7WqWOr6Wa/oN+6HQzR0jTn8
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fcooDDXXYbeXnEFcgmTwmRMtxpU=
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (SunOS)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit