🚀 go-pugleaf

"cth" <a@b.c> wrote in message 
news:woNNk.9184$sc2.3866@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Dan Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>> Sorry for typos and my sloppy writing.  It is late and I am beat.
>>>> Anyway, does anyone know if UT will install and run well on Vista64? 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> FWIW, I just re-installed UT(2003) and UT2004 on my Vista Ultimate 64.
>>>
>>> They go pretty good ;-). Have to turn off the HUD bounce (view bob?) 
>>> because the whole image just shudders when you run :-D
>>>
>>> My ultimate plan:
>>> At auction, I bought 2 HP Proliant DL560 2U rack servers (4 x 2.5G HT 
>>> XEONs + 4G RAM in each) installed with VMWare ESXi (free hypervisor). I 
>>> plan to run maybe 4 - 6 dedicated server VMs on each (UT plus some other 
>>> non-UT dedicated servers - any recommendations?).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris.
>>>
>>
>> Chris, thanks for the info about your UT03 and UT04 and how they are 
>> running with Vista64.  I will see what happens with UT99, this weekend.
>
> I'll probably install that too this weekend ;-)
>
> What I'm disappointed in though is DeusEx. For the life of me I can't get 
> this to run. Haven't tried the original but the sequel is definitely 
> giving me problems. Still searching the web for an informed forum.
>
>> Regarding your non-UT server, I supposed a dedicated server with the Xeon 
>> processor will run Crysis, so if that is the case, then I recommend the 
>> new Crysis Wars.  It is a better game than the original Crysis 
>> multiplayer game.  I think Call of Duty 4 may have reached it's peak, and 
>> I see plenty of servers that sit empty at times.  Of course there are 
>> servers that are popular and always have people in them.  Okay,
>
> Thanks, I'll check them out.
>
>> maybe you can have a vote taken, but it may be a good idea to start a new 
>> thread, as "Test" in the subject line here probably is not doing your 
>> subject matter any favors.
>
> When it's the only active thread, does it really matter LOL!
>

You have a good point!  :)