🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.unreal
Article #174346

Re: 2003 vs 2004 Performance ?

#174346
From: koorb
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:56
11 lines
1273 bytes
On 27 Feb 2004 15:28:01 -0800, tommyblackman@hotmail.com (Tommy)
wrote:

>I was just wondering if people thought they experience any more of a
>performance hit 2k3 > 2k4. I havent got either game - but the
>'recommended' requirements appear to be the same that Ive seen. (I say
>this because my system is roughly equal to that
>www.unrealtournament.com)

UT2004 looks a little better with the pixel shaders, but they seem to
run the same.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1bp040pn5lligv7rj73gr9smntku88gm3g@4ax.com>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!diablo.theplanet.net!news.theplanet.net!not-for-mail
References: <38efa3d0.0402271528.49edc44b@posting.google.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!diablo.theplanet.net!news.theplanet.net!not-for-mail
From: koorb <koorb@raiders.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.games.unreal
Subject: Re: 2003 vs 2004 Performance ?
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:56:03 +0000
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <1bp040pn5lligv7rj73gr9smntku88gm3g@4ax.com>
References: <38efa3d0.0402271528.49edc44b@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.79.12.212
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news8.svr.pol.co.uk 1077962165 27363 81.79.12.212 (28 Feb 2004 09:56:05 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Feb 2004 09:56:05 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse@theplanet.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.646
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit