Article View: alt.games.unreal
Article #172024Re: 39 FPS on UT 2003 with Radeon 9700 !
From: Skid
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:30
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:30
55 lines
3310 bytes
3310 bytes
You can post all the links you want, but you seem to be missing the point. 1.) The XP 1800+ runs at an actual 1.53 ghz. 2.) It performs a little faster than a P4 1.8 ghz, close to a P4 2 ghz in benchmarks, games and apps. The mistake that most people make in comparing the two is not realizing that the Athlon handles more instructions per clock cycle than the Pentium IV. The post that started all this claimed that the Athlon XP 1800+ was the equivalent of a Pentium IV running at 1.5 ghz. That's just not true. The P4 1.5 is slower, and not just by a little bit. In fact, test after test at site after site shows that AT THE SAME ACTUAL CLOCK SPEED the Athlon wins. On the other hand, comparing an XP 1800+ to a P4 1.8 is about right, though I'd pick the Athlon for most apps and games and save some bucks in the process. That's the whole reason AMD started using a "performance rating" higher than the actual clock speed, so people who do their homework wouldn't be fooled by the higher numbers. Apparently some people still are. But don't take my word for it, read the cpu reviews at www.anandtech.com or www.tomshardware.com or anywhere else they match the two. "Jay "Boogieman" Edwards" <boog...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xns930B50AC7281boogie350NOSPAMyahoo@216.168.3.44... > "Hans Gruber" <hanz...@hotmail.com> wrote in > news:b0l9d3$q1492$1...@ID-147232.news.dfncis.de: > > > "Nightowl" <ati...@killspammers.min.midco.net> wrote in message > > news:v2s69lb7e9052a@corp.supernews.com... > >> The Athlon 1800+ from my understanding is the equivelent of a Pentium > >> 4 1.5GHZ. > > > > I would love to see proof of that. Got a URL of a site with benchmarks > > to back this claim of yours? ;) > > > > > > > > Here's another... > > http://www.dslreports.com/faq/2281 > > > -- > ____________________________________________________ > Windows is suck! All you harddrive are belong to us! > Please click 'OK' to install our trojan keylogger > or 'CANCEL' to install it regardless! > Thank You. > > The Microsoft Team
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C1xX9.86267$1q3.17462@sccrnsc01>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!newsfeed.mathworks.com!wn13feed!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.204!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!sccrnsc01.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<c4d04f8b.0301212001.303ccd2b@posting.google.com> <v2s69lb7e9052a@corp.supernews.com> <b0l9d3$q1492$1@ID-147232.news.dfncis.de> <Xns930B50AC7281boogie350NOSPAMyahoo@216.168.3.44>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!newsfeed.mathworks.com!wn13feed!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.204!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!sccrnsc01.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Skid" <sk...@attbi.com> Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,alt.games.unreal.tournament2003,alt.games.unreal References: <c4d04f8b.0301212001.303ccd2b@posting.google.com> <v2s69lb7e9052a@corp.supernews.com> <b0l9d3$q1492$1@ID-147232.news.dfncis.de> <Xns930B50AC7281boogie350NOSPAMyahoo@216.168.3.44> Subject: Re: 39 FPS on UT 2003 with Radeon 9700 ! Lines: 57 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <C1xX9.86267$1q3.17462@sccrnsc01> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.125.32.244 X-Complaints-To: ab...@attbi.com X-Trace: sccrnsc01 1043242210 24.125.32.244 (Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:30:10 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:30:10 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:30:23 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit