🚀 go-pugleaf

"goPostal" <agutgopostal@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:KLcOh.45$996.33@newsfe06.lga...
>
> "Folk" <Folk@folk.com> wrote in message 
> news:nlii031bnsi57r29tgdc7td5kvhc5iel1l@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:03:15 -0700, "goPostal"
>> <agutgopostal@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>  IIRC it said that
>>>60% of people who played UT2004 actually played it offline so they are
>>>really going to pitch to them this go-round.
>>
>> I don't believe that figure.  They claim that they arrived at it by
>> comparing ID's seen online against ID's of known sold copies, but I
>> still feel it's got to be low.
>
> Yeah, I felt a little ambiguity about that meself. However if you use this 
> NG as something of an informal poll, the average age of UT players is a 
> lot older than you would think. (SORRY GUYS!) Maybe this older demographic 
> just doesn't have the interest in the online hopfests that the younger 
> crowd does. I know I'll play on a particular server just to get the maps 
> to play offline. There's still a lot of cheating and some people just 
> can't tolerate that. Not to mention too that it takes quite some time to 
> become proficient enough to do nothing but respawn. It can be frustrating 
> if you don't perservere.

Don't apologise matey at our ages as if  we should give a ŹFF<  I had a look 
at the trailer seems  very good just how the gameplay and what system 
requirements are you can't tell and dammit I am not upgradeing again this 
year unless there is a better than good reason. I've signed up for the 
updates so see you on the trial server failing that back to Monster Hunt and 
the UT Explosive server.

Nick-Dastardly
recycled supercharged teenager with a grudge