🚀 go-pugleaf

J.H. wrote:
> Albert Conklin wrote:
>> J.H. wrote:
>>> Trimble Bracegirdle wrote:
>>>> Your comment J.H. illustrates the problem barrier any sequel comes 
>>>> up against.
>>>> You hate T3 ..many complained that it was 'not right'.
>>>>
>>>> BUT I started the Thief games with T3 & (with some reservations) 
>>>> like it.
>>>> I went to T2 later & like it but don't have a need to compare.
>>>>
>>>> T4 would be hated both by T3 & separately, T2 people  .
>>>> Its only hope for a good reception is if its just very good .
>>>> (\__/)
>>>> (='.'=)
>>>> (")_(")  mouse (can't please all of the people any of the time 
>>>> sometimes)
>>>>
>>>
>>> i think they made it impossible themselves to be happy with any new 
>>> thief game.  the ending was ridiculous!  the outcome of the main 
>>> storyline meant we would never have our thief back (as we knew him). 
>>> providing 3rd person view (mistake!!) as an option destroyed the 
>>> feeling of being there, and gave garett an identity outside of the 
>>> player.  we never really had a face before outside of shadows and 
>>> some artwork.  and garrett turned out to be one *uuuugly* dude!
>>
>> Lol....about the Ugly part.
>>  Even though it was optional, I disliked the option of siding with one 
>> faction or the other, or both, or neither. Garrett is a loaner.
>>  Haven't played it, but the subtitled game "Chaos Theory" starts off 
>> with a stealth only level. You can shoot out some lights with a 
>> silencer to keep it dark. It would arouse a few bad guys, but you were 
>> still being stealthy.
>>  Also had some lock picking in it similar to T3.
>> Albert
>> Albert
> 
> do you mean splinter cell?
That was it. Splinter Cell.
Albert