🚀 go-pugleaf

J.H. wrote:
> Trimble Bracegirdle wrote:
>> Your comment J.H. illustrates the problem barrier any sequel comes up 
>> against.
>> You hate T3 ..many complained that it was 'not right'.
>>
>> BUT I started the Thief games with T3 & (with some reservations) like it.
>> I went to T2 later & like it but don't have a need to compare.
>>
>> T4 would be hated both by T3 & separately, T2 people  .
>> Its only hope for a good reception is if its just very good .
>> (\__/)
>> (='.'=)
>> (")_(")  mouse (can't please all of the people any of the time sometimes)
>>
> 
> i think they made it impossible themselves to be happy with any new 
> thief game.  the ending was ridiculous!  the outcome of the main 
> storyline meant we would never have our thief back (as we knew him). 
> providing 3rd person view (mistake!!) as an option destroyed the feeling 
> of being there, and gave garett an identity outside of the player.  we 
> never really had a face before outside of shadows and some artwork.  and 
> garrett turned out to be one *uuuugly* dude!

Lol....about the Ugly part.
  Even though it was optional, I disliked the option of siding with one 
faction or the other, or both, or neither. Garrett is a loaner.
  Haven't played it, but the subtitled game "Chaos Theory" starts off 
with a stealth only level. You can shoot out some lights with a silencer 
to keep it dark. It would arouse a few bad guys, but you were still 
being stealthy.
  Also had some lock picking in it similar to T3.
Albert
Albert