🚀 go-pugleaf

erimess wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:16:19 GMT, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Eep=B2?=
> <eepN...@tnlc.com> wrote:
> 
> >>
> >> > > > action-adventure (note the lack of capitalization since they're
> >> > > > not proper nouns)
> >>
> 
> >
> ><shrug> Whatever...looks perfectly fine to me. Either explain why YOU think it's wrong or shut the hell up, troll.
> >
> 
> I could care less what he's talking about, but one thing I did notice
> is that while most people tend to start their answers with capital
> letters (even when they're not full sentences, things like this are
> treated like a sentence in terms of capitalization), you've done your
> answer starting with lower case.
> 
> Now frankly, I could care less.  But what I do care about is that you
> would do that, and then in the same sentence get nitpicky about not
> capitalizing genres.  Now, in case you don't know how to extrapolate,
> that means, you're being hypocritical.  As usual.
> 
> (I see a prediction of the answer coming, followed with a <duh> of
> course.  Sorry, too late.  Answer unacceptable.)
> 
> And some people, BTW, do tend to use genre names as though they are
> proper nouns, which is an OK thing.  (If we can capitalize wine types,
> even when they're not a region of a country, then we can certainly
> capitalize genres, huh?)  But I really don't think it's something for
> you to get so upset about.  You go off on a tangent and scream and
> holler when you think people are getting on your case too much over
> what you consider to be stupid stuff.  And yet you're nickpicking
> about something this stupid.  Again, hypocritical.  As you've said
> many times, GET OVER IT!!
> 
> I've also noticed that you're lying again.  You just started a new
> thread with your answer to Luke, even though the subject didn't
> change.  You were talking about the exact same subject but you felt it
> necessary to change threads.  Yet you claim you only do that when the
> subject has changed.  Makes it quite difficult to find your answers --
> not that I care if I find them, mind you, but if your intention was
> for someone to actually read your answer (and I'm sure it was), then
> you could leave it in the same thread when it's the same exact
> subject.
> 
> And while we're at it, was there a reason it was necessary to add two
> crossposts to this?  OK, we were talking about action elements in
> adventure games, and then a little bit on action games themselves, and
> Thief got *vaguely* mentioned, but do you really think these other
> people are interesting in jumping into the middle of a thread that's
> been going on for days and that they haven't been reading?   Or was it
> really so you could spread your trolling around a bit more?
> 
> And you wonder why people call you a troll.  Well, I'm telling you.
> But of course, you won't understand, as usual.  I take that back.  I
> think you full well understand.  You just won't admit it.
> 
> So, go ahead, go off on one of your rants and tell me to get over it.
> 
> erimess
> 
> I know God won't give me more
> than I can handle. I just wish
> he wouldn't trust me so much.
...............................


                !8]  <- (I DO hope that's gramatically 'correct') ;]
                ~~~

             Apologies for adding to this thread. - I can't help but note
             the formula of being 'offended' and then assuming a superior
             stance from which to be abusive. - It's a text book example.

             Though I wonder at the existance of any replies, (including
             my own) - I've learned by you and Chris and Luke - that I'm
             in good company. - Thanks! - Here it comes again - ready? ->
             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Best Wishes ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



-Praise The Builder

-Third Keeper
-(At Large)

-30% Flaps - Full Burn - Release - - - - - - - >             - Max -
.  .................................................................