🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.starcraft
Article #293136

Re: Playing Starcraft by voice

#293136
From: Steve Kaye
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 06:51
50 lines
3239 bytes
On 08 Aug 2011 18:14:42 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:

>Steve Kaye <nospam giddy-kippers.co.uk> wrote:
>> You need to press 3 once, then tab once, then the two key 
>> presses required to create a siege tank* four times.  
>
>That is true and it would be less cumbersome if the barracks is 
>always listed as the second subgroup, after the factory. If not, 
>the listed method works. 

I'm fairly sure that the order of the sub groups is always the same
given the same types of sub-group.  

I know that with protoss combat units, Sentry is always listed first,
then Stalker and then way down the list is Probes.  It's handy because
I know that I can group Sentries with Zealots and still have very
quick access to the sentries' special abilities.  Also, I need to know
not to group High Templars with Sentries because I'll not be able to
get to their special abilities as quickly if I do.


>My main concern at the moment is finding an efficient way to
>string opening commands together. Given the retarded interface
>that requires resources before anything is put in the queue
>(regardless of when that object is built or produced), very
>tedious timing is necessary. 

Yeah, it would be better if you could queue up units at any time
regardless of whether you can afford it or not.  That way it could
start building as soon as you have the materials.  It's only like
queuing units when you are supply blocked after all.

It wouldn't work with buildings as they are all commands to build
right now and you can't really queue them in the same way.


>So I'm trying to jump together a
>method for recording opening scripts that includes the timing. I
>would like to start with a script that beats the AI on Steppes of
>War (on various AI difficulty levels). 


>Going to be a while before I can handle multiplayer, if ever. 

A lot of people would complain if they found out that you were playing
on ladder with scripts like the ones you post here.  And if they
officially complained then you'd be in danger of getting suspended or
banned.

steve.kaye
Technical Details
Message-ID: <7ll1475rphbutdhncng6hpdqrj9v5djjmv@4ax.com>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <4e28d32b$0$1852$c3e8da3$9b4ff22a@news.astraweb.com> <4e2bbe0d$0$10084$c3e8da3$50776f34@news.astraweb.com> <698q275mlme9r9o52hj44q89ufalga4kq4@4ax.com> <4e3c6917$0$35544$c3e8da3$4db35a27@news.astraweb.com> <cg8v371tio9if5njnvre7qrftpuhqo10v3@4ax.com> <4e402792$0$26278$c3e8da3$2e0018d8@news.astraweb.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Steve Kaye <nos...@giddy-kippers.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.games.starcraft
Subject: Re: Playing Starcraft by voice
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 07:51:11 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <7ll1475rphbutdhncng6hpdqrj9v5djjmv@4ax.com>
References: <4e28d32b$0$1852$c3e8da3$9b4ff22a@news.astraweb.com> <4e2bbe0d$0$10084$c3e8da3$50776f34@news.astraweb.com> <698q275mlme9r9o52hj44q89ufalga4kq4@4ax.com> <4e3c6917$0$35544$c3e8da3$4db35a27@news.astraweb.com> <cg8v371tio9if5njnvre7qrftpuhqo10v3@4ax.com> <4e402792$0$26278$c3e8da3$2e0018d8@news.astraweb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="AohoESHY9KsAZrmEIGKcGA"; logging-data="9624"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18lXpFo8+stQtskKpohcJp9/kTlwCm1hz4="
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jlIhPLkWsXjlNxGfAwmJy+P/1HQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit