🚀 go-pugleaf

"The Ignorant Asian" <ste...@nodomainname.com> wrote in message 
news:45ff52c9$1_1@news.tm.net.my...
> "Luc The Perverse" <sll_noSpamli...@cc.usu.edu> wrote in message 
> news:v1s2d4-rmf.ln1@loki.cmears.id.au...
>> "The Ignorant Asian" <ste...@nodomainname.com> wrote in message 
>> news:45fe6b3d_1@news.tm.net.my...
>>> If there is such a feature, I am intrigue to know more. Folder and user 
>>> rights permissions is what we administrators have been dreaming off 
>>> since day one. For corporate environment, the users are not supposed to 
>>> have administrator's account. THE IT DEPARTMENT IS THE LORD AND MASTER! 
>>> :
>>
>> I highly doubt it.  It was probably hard coded somewhere by some intern 
>> programmer.
>
> You're misleading. It is lucky that you're not yet the President of the 
> United States.

No you have to be full of shit and have hundreds of millions of dollars to 
do that.

Now stop insulting Bush or he will invade your country.

Heil Bush!

>>> BAH! Big deal! Even if I were to have read your ranting thus far, I 
>>> would still agree with Bill Gates and install Vista anyway. Users need 
>>> to be controlled (with an iron fists if I may add :P) and that is final!
>>
>> I said I can understand such a restriction being an option.  What I 
>> cannot understand is it being denied by default.  That is messed up.
>
> If it is not a default option, lazy administrators like me won't even be 
> bothered to set it up as the time to issue a new PC to the users are like 
> 2~3 hours upon delivery of the PC.

Forgive me for shouting but A USER SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO CONTROL HIS DESKTOP 
EVEN IF HE IS NOT AN ADMIN!!!  Ok I feel better now.

> </EVIL ADMINISTRATOR>
> "It's not about restriction, ITS KEEPING THOSE DARN USERS IN LINE!"
> <EVIL ADMINISTRATOR>

Your mixed up the </TAG> is supposed to go at the end

>> I'm sure there are a lot of sadomasichistic people who would love to 
>> install an OS that lets them do nothing.  Of course, it is cheaper to 
>> have no OS at all ;)
>
> I agree.

Thank you

>> Touch�e.   Keep in mind, Vista is currently being shoved down home users' 
>> throats - Windows XP can still be sold as business machines without 
>> threat of loss of kickbacks.
>
> Excuse me but since when do home users have to pay for Windows OS :p

Vista is quite hard to rip off comparitively.

>>> What feature is that? My time spend with Vista was kinda limited.
>>
>> You lost me somewhere.
>
> Technically speaking since you started it, YOU are the one who made me get 
> lost.

We are both lost.  Please don't leave me Mr Bean!

>>> Well, you're not supposed to play with Codecs at work :p
>>
>> I wasn't at work ;)
>>
>> Putty just as easily could have been a D.O.S. client, or a password 
>> grabbing trojan horse
>
> The word Putty sounds awefully familiar.

Lightweight, standalone SSH client.  I use it log into remote linux boxes 
(IE Chris' box)

http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/

Of course you could also be thinking of silly putty

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silly_Putty

--
LTP

:)