🚀 go-pugleaf

"The Ignorant Asian" <ste...@nodomainname.com> wrote in message 
news:45fe6b3d_1@news.tm.net.my...
> If there is such a feature, I am intrigue to know more. Folder and user 
> rights permissions is what we administrators have been dreaming off since 
> day one. For corporate environment, the users are not supposed to have 
> administrator's account. THE IT DEPARTMENT IS THE LORD AND MASTER! :

I highly doubt it.  It was probably hard coded somewhere by some intern 
programmer.

> BAH! Big deal! Even if I were to have read your ranting thus far, I would 
> still agree with Bill Gates and install Vista anyway. Users need to be 
> controlled (with an iron fists if I may add :P) and that is final!

I said I can understand such a restriction being an option.  What I cannot 
understand is it being denied by default.  That is messed up.

I'm sure there are a lot of sadomasichistic people who would love to install 
an OS that lets them do nothing.  Of course, it is cheaper to have no OS at 
all ;)

> We administrators gets kinda edgy whenever a user calls up and says that 
> their icon to the ERP system is missing from their desktop. It makes you 
> feel like taking out a shot gun and blow them away in pieces. Of course if 
> the request were to be coming from your computer illiterate boss, you have 
> to be happy to oblidge (with some self swearing).

Touch�e.   Keep in mind, Vista is currently being shoved down home users' 
throats - Windows XP can still be sold as business machines without threat 
of loss of kickbacks.

> What feature is that? My time spend with Vista was kinda limited.

You lost me somewhere.

> Well, you're not supposed to play with Codecs at work :p

I wasn't at work ;)

Putty just as easily could have been a D.O.S. client, or a password grabbing 
trojan horse

--
LTP

:)