🚀 go-pugleaf

"Josh 'Ramen' Miller" <lame...@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1141831044.621552.99090@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> Luc The Perverse wrote:
>> "jerk-o" <jer...@yomomma.org> wrote in message
>> news:kqir02p7tvctqpdc77sa6ajk58v5skhkuq@4ax.com...
>> > "Josh 'Ramen' Miller" <lame...@gmail.com> wrote
>> >>jerk-o wrote:
>> >>> "Josh 'Ramen' Miller" <lame...@gmail.com> wrote
>> >>> >jerk-o wrote:
>> >>> >> Avenger <av...@agff.net> wrote
>> >>> >> >On 2006-03-03 11:43:18 -0400, jerk-o <jer...@yomomma.org> said:
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >> "Josh 'Ramen' Miller" <lame...@gmail.com> wrote
>> >>> >> >>> jerk-o wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>> After going to <http://tinyurl.com/2tnqw>
>> >>> >> >>>> "Josh 'Ramen' Miller" <lame...@gmail.com> wrote
>> >>> >> >>>>> I DECLARE AS KING THAT NO ONE IS ALLOWED TO DISPUTE ME!!!!
>> >>> >> >>>> I refuse to reply to this blatent troll.
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> I refuse to troll this blatant reply.
>> >>> >> >> I refuse to reply to refusal to troll this blatant refusal to
>> >>> >> >> reply to this
>> >>> >> >> blatant troll.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >I HATE CASCADES!
>> >>> >> I refuse to reply to this post about hating cascades.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >I refuse to cascade this hated post about hating cascades.
>> >>> I refuse to reply to this refusal to cascade this hated post about
>> >>> hating
>> >>> cascades that was replyed to a refusal to reply fo refuse to troll 
>> >>> this
>> >>> blatant
>> >>> refusal to reply to this blatant troll.
>> >>
>> >>I AM SO CHOWNED!!
>> > I refuse to reply to this reply about being chowned by a refusal to 
>> > reply
>> > to
>> > this refusal to cascade this hated post about hating cascades that was
>> > replyed
>> > to a refusal to reply to refuse to troll this blatant refusal to reply 
>> > to
>> > this
>> > blatant troll.
>>
>> SHUT THE FUCK UP
>>
>> It's not getting old - no . .  it's way WAY past that point.
>>
>> It's reaching the point where I am willing to spend up to a quater 
>> million
>> dollars just to track you down and launch a missile attack against your
>> house so I never have to read this again.
>>
>> Plonking, I suppose, is a more cost effective option.
>
> Wow... "Plonk".
>
> Welcome to 1998 here people.

t3h plonk!!!!

--
LTP

:)