🚀 go-pugleaf

"sven the unpleasant" <would...@liketoknow.com> wrote in message 
news:pan.2004.08.25.15.18.08.275202@liketoknow.com...
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:04:40 +1200, Marsh Lion wrote:
>
>>
>> "sven the unpleasant" <would...@liketoknow.com> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2004.08.24.22.38.27.287039@liketoknow.com...
>>
>>> Ugh, another example of religion stealing a person's happiness away, and
>>> for what? Empty promises of future happiness. How unfortunate.
>>
>> It means that I wont get a girl pregnant with a child I don't want (and
>> could seriously screw my life over, if it happened 3 or more years ago). 
>> It
>> means that I am very unlikely to get STD's. It means that a girl wont 
>> abuse
>> me just for sex (ok that's not much of a guy isssue). And that's just the
>> sex side of things.
>>
>> If you wish to conter this arguement with contraception, mistakes happen
>> with condoms, she may forget her pill. The only way to make sure that you
>> can't get a female pregnant is not to have sex full stop.
>
> I'll counter your argument with the fact that, no matter how much you like
> a girl, you simply may not be sexually compatible.
And this means what? There are other ways of getting a female pregnant. If 
she is unable to carry a baby, she would have the same problems whoever she 
was with. If a man cannot produce sperm, no matter who he is with, he will 
have trouble reproducing.

If if is a matter of physical attraction, your body's beauty will fade (and 
you'll probably end up getting a divorce anyway).

> And you won't find this
> out until after you tie the knot. Which leads to affairs. Which leads to
> divorce. Which is a big sin in itself, isn't it?

The basis of a christian relationship is not sex so I fail to see the 
problem here.

--
Marsh Lion