🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:10:41 +0200, Phorse 5
<dapho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

>Luc Teh Pervrse wrote:
>> 
>> > > http://www.playitcybersafe.com/Poll-August102004.pdf
>> >
>> >
>> > I like how they just call child pornography simply, "Online Pornography".
>> > Such a blatant attempt to keep people (of the future) away from porn.
>> 
>> This doesn't necessarily apply here but I find it rather offensive they just
>> come out and say that pornography is harmful to children with no scientific
>> backing.   It's as bad as the people who say decay of the family is what
>> destroyed Greece and Rome - only difference is the latter are people
>> babbling in church, the first is an argument used in politics/courtroom etc.
>> 
>> I suppose at 5849.0625 days of age people are no longer harmed by pr0n, but
>> a day before that, or even minutes sometimes (which may be difficult to
>> discern because sometimes birth certificates are inaccurate, and timezone
>> issues)
>> 
>> I can't even talk dirty to my wife, the fetus may overhear and be scarred
>> for life.   (We got some belly earphones, maybe if I turn them loud enough)
>
>I find most censorship ridiculous. What do you play through the
>bellyphones?

Starcraft.