🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: alt.games.quake2
35 messages
35 total messages Started by Phil Thu, 05 May 2005 02:10
Need a cheat
#282618
Author: Phil
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 02:10
8 lines
1360 bytes
Dug out Quake after 5 years still an awesome game, need a cheat for a level 
that I haven't got to yet, I think it's called the jail house , involves 
jumping over lave /magma and hitting a button, I never mastered the 
spinning jump thing ...  I don't need all the cheats just the one that makes 
you pass thru' walls I believe .

              Thanks ,
                             Phil
Re: Need a cheat
#282621
Author: Dan C
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 02:12
13 lines
1417 bytes
On Wed, 04 May 2005 21:10:18 -0500, Phil wrote:

> Dug out Quake after 5 years still an awesome game, need a cheat for a level 
> that I haven't got to yet, I think it's called the jail house , involves 
> jumping over lave /magma and hitting a button, I never mastered the 
> spinning jump thing ...  I don't need all the cheats just the one that makes 
> you pass thru' walls I believe .

Maybe you should ask in the Quake newsgroup?

-- 
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951
Re: Need a cheat
#282659
Author: Todd Day
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 02:37
20 lines
1840 bytes
Pull down the console and type in "noclip" without the quotation marks, 
of course. This will allow you to fly, pass through walls and floors, 
etc. Once you get where you want to go .... simply go back to the 
console and type in "noclip" again to deactivate it.

Frag on!!

thetodd

Phil wrote:
> Dug out Quake after 5 years still an awesome game, need a cheat for a level 
> that I haven't got to yet, I think it's called the jail house , involves 
> jumping over lave /magma and hitting a button, I never mastered the 
> spinning jump thing ...  I don't need all the cheats just the one that makes 
> you pass thru' walls I believe .
> 
>               Thanks ,
>                              Phil
> 
> 
Re: Need a cheat
#282660
Author: Phil
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 21:37
13 lines
1515 bytes
"Todd Day" <thetodd@bellsouth.net> wrote in message 
news:Uyfee.2776$Qp.1895@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> Pull down the console and type in "noclip" without the quotation marks, of 
> course. This will allow you to fly, pass through walls and floors, etc. 
> Once you get where you want to go .... simply go back to the console and 
> type in "noclip" again to deactivate it.
>
> Frag on!!
>
> thetodd

Thanks Todd  ! 
Re: Need a cheat
#282637
Author: Pasquale Imbemba
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 14:07
8 lines
1194 bytes
Dan C wrote:
> 
> Maybe you should ask in the Quake newsgroup?
> 

So what's this ng about? ;-)

Pasquale
Re: Need a cheat
#282633
Author: Dr. Mellow
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 14:14
16 lines
1161 bytes
Pasquale Imbemba wrote:
> Dan C wrote:
> 
>>
>> Maybe you should ask in the Quake newsgroup?
>>
> 
> So what's this ng about? ;-)
> 
> Pasquale

Quake "2," there are also Quake3 groups.

How shoot red rope?

Mellow
Re: Need a cheat
#282629
Author: Dan C
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 15:35
11 lines
1224 bytes
On Fri, 13 May 2005 14:07:37 +0000, Pasquale Imbemba wrote:

>> Maybe you should ask in the Quake newsgroup?
 
> So what's this ng about? ;-)

You can't figure that out, from the name of the group?  Sheesh.

-- 
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951
Re: Need a cheat
#282631
Author: Margolis
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 18:57
21 lines
1768 bytes
"Dan C" <youmustbejoking@invalid.lan> wrote in message 
news:pan.2005.05.13.15.35.17.244304@invalid.lan...
> On Fri, 13 May 2005 14:07:37 +0000, Pasquale Imbemba wrote:
>
>>> Maybe you should ask in the Quake newsgroup?
>
>> So what's this ng about? ;-)
>
> You can't figure that out, from the name of the group?  Sheesh.
>

but you are making a big mistake.  The original poster may have said 
"quake", but they obviously meant quake2 since the "jail" level is a level 
in q2 and  not the original quake.  That is why it was posted to this ng and 
not the quake group.

-- 

Margolis
http://web.archive.org/web/20030215212142/http://www.agqx.org/faqs/AGQ2FAQ.htm
http://www.unrealtower.org/faq
Re: Need a cheat
#282634
Author: Margolis
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 18:58
16 lines
1504 bytes
"Dr. Mellow" <Mellow@spamblock.com> wrote in message 
news:4284b62b$1_2@news.unc.edu...
> Pasquale Imbemba wrote:
>
> Quake "2," there are also Quake3 groups.
>


yes there are, but this is the correct ng for this question, since it is a 
question about q2.

-- 

Margolis
http://web.archive.org/web/20030215212142/http://www.agqx.org/faqs/AGQ2FAQ.htm
http://www.unrealtower.org/faq
Re: Need a cheat
#282647
Author: James Christie
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 19:03
24 lines
1999 bytes
In message <pan.2005.05.13.15.35.17.244304@invalid.lan>, Dan C 
<youmustbejoking@invalid.lan> writes
>On Fri, 13 May 2005 14:07:37 +0000, Pasquale Imbemba wrote:
>
>>> Maybe you should ask in the Quake newsgroup?
>
>> So what's this ng about? ;-)
>
>You can't figure that out, from the name of the group?  Sheesh.
>

I think this group would be a good option for him, for the simple reason 
that most of, if not all the Quake newsgroups seem to be dead.
I know, I've tried in the past, asking a question about Glquake, and 
received no reply (and there were no other posts in said ng either), 
whereas in here we have a pretty good lot who helpfully gave me a hand 
in solving my problem.
-- 
Regards,

James Christie

"Luck is my middle name," he said, indistinctly.
"Mind you, my first name is Bad."
Re: Need a cheat
#282628
Author: Dan C
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 19:10
18 lines
1804 bytes
On Fri, 13 May 2005 13:57:11 -0500, Margolis wrote:

> but you are making a big mistake.  The original poster may have said 
> "quake", but they obviously meant quake2 since the "jail" level is a level 
> in q2 and  not the original quake.

I'm not making a big mistake.  The original poster said "quake".  If you
happen to have all the map names memorized, and know that he meant
"Quake2", that's great.  I didn't know that map name (as most people
wouldn't), and I can't read minds.

> That is why it was posted to this ng and not the quake group.

He should have been clear.  Don't defend sloppiness.

-- 
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951
Re: Need a cheat
#282632
Author: Havard C Skale
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 19:18
26 lines
2298 bytes
In article <pan.2005.05.13.19.10.11.284129@invalid.lan>, 
youmustbejoking@invalid.lan says...
> On Fri, 13 May 2005 13:57:11 -0500, Margolis wrote:
> 
> > but you are making a big mistake.  The original poster may have said 
> > "quake", but they obviously meant quake2 since the "jail" level is a level 
> > in q2 and  not the original quake.
> 
> I'm not making a big mistake.  The original poster said "quake".  If you
> happen to have all the map names memorized, and know that he meant
> "Quake2", that's great.  I didn't know that map name (as most people
> wouldn't), and I can't read minds.
> 
> > That is why it was posted to this ng and not the quake group.
> 
> He should have been clear.  Don't defend sloppiness.
> 
> 
It's not like theres _that_ much traffic in here you know. Besides we 
did answer questions about Quake even when there actually was quite some 
traffic in the group.
-- 
Ole.C.Brumm[AGQ2] aka Skyvalker[AGQ2]
    One Server to rule them all, One Server to find them,
    One Server to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
    In the Haus of Sigil where the Shadows lie.
Re: Need a cheat
#282635
Author: James Christie
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 20:05
36 lines
2631 bytes
In message <pan.2005.05.13.19.10.11.284129@invalid.lan>, Dan C 
<youmustbejoking@invalid.lan> writes
>On Fri, 13 May 2005 13:57:11 -0500, Margolis wrote:
>
>> but you are making a big mistake.  The original poster may have said
>> "quake", but they obviously meant quake2 since the "jail" level is a level
>> in q2 and  not the original quake.
>
>I'm not making a big mistake.  The original poster said "quake".  If you
>happen to have all the map names memorized, and know that he meant
>"Quake2", that's great.  I didn't know that map name (as most people
>wouldn't), and I can't read minds.
>
>> That is why it was posted to this ng and not the quake group.
>
>He should have been clear.  Don't defend sloppiness.
>

What does it matter? It was recognised by others what he meant, and they 
answered his question, that's what we're all here for, to share 
information.

We are NOT here to be petty minded about how people phrase questions or 
what the questions themselves are about, both of which contribute 
nothing whatsoever.

If you're just going to be negative and petty in your comments (and you 
seem to be alone in that stance), and if it bothers you that much, then 
why bother to read the posts, or more to the point reply to them?
-- 
Regards,

James Christie

"Luck is my middle name," he said, indistinctly.
"Mind you, my first name is Bad."
Re: Need a cheat
#282636
Author: Phil
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 14:40
8 lines
1497 bytes
> He should have been clear.  Don't defend sloppiness.
> If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
> Linux Registered User #327951
>

  Personally I thought you were nitpicking , if I posted a question  about a 
Ford in Chrysler newsgroup it would have been sloppy. 
Re: Need a cheat
#282638
Author: Dan C
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 15:03
13 lines
1664 bytes
On Sat, 14 May 2005 09:40:12 -0500, Phil wrote:

>> He should have been clear.  Don't defend sloppiness.

>   Personally I thought you were nitpicking , if I posted a question 
>   about a Ford in Chrysler newsgroup it would have been sloppy.

Indeed it would, but why would you think there are both a Quake and a
Quake2 newsgroup?  Why not use the right one?

-- 
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951
Re: Need a cheat
#282639
Author: James Christie
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 19:22
23 lines
1903 bytes
In message <pan.2005.05.14.15.03.44.108902@invalid.lan>, Dan C 
<youmustbejoking@invalid.lan> writes
>On Sat, 14 May 2005 09:40:12 -0500, Phil wrote:
>
>>> He should have been clear.  Don't defend sloppiness.
>
>>   Personally I thought you were nitpicking , if I posted a question
>>   about a Ford in Chrysler newsgroup it would have been sloppy.
>
>Indeed it would, but why would you think there are both a Quake and a
>Quake2 newsgroup?  Why not use the right one?
>

Because the Quake ng is dead, no posts*, nada. Get it?

* Or very sporadic at best
-- 
Regards,

James Christie

"Luck is my middle name," he said, indistinctly.
"Mind you, my first name is Bad."
Re: Need a cheat
#282649
Author: Pasquale Imbemba
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 18:03
22 lines
1616 bytes
Dan C wrote:


> 
>>>Maybe you should ask in the Quake newsgroup?
> 
>  
> 
>>So what's this ng about? ;-)
> 
> 
> You can't figure that out, from the name of the group?  Sheesh.
> 


Ahm, yes. That's what I wanted to say. The guy was asking about Quake 2; 
you told him to ask in Quake ng. But this *is* the correct ng! ;-)

So, I figured out. That guy did also. But did *you*? :-D

Take it easy.
Pasquale
Re: Need a cheat
#282641
Author: Pasquale Imbemba
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 18:05
9 lines
1561 bytes
Dan C wrote:

> Indeed it would, but why would you think there are both a Quake and a
> Quake2 newsgroup?  Why not use the right one?
> 

Hey, open your eyes: He *DID* choose the right one! :-)

Pasquale
Re: Need a cheat
#282650
Author: Dan C
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 20:24
14 lines
1559 bytes
On Sun, 15 May 2005 18:03:40 +0000, Pasquale Imbemba wrote:

> Ahm, yes. That's what I wanted to say. The guy was asking about Quake 2; 
> you told him to ask in Quake ng. But this *is* the correct ng! ;-)
> 
> So, I figured out. That guy did also. But did *you*? :-D

His original question said "Quake".  Go back and read it if you don't
believe me.  This is the "Quake2" newsgroup.  What the fuck is so hard to
figure out, genius?  

-- 
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951
Re: Need a cheat
#282644
Author: Dan C
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 20:25
13 lines
1728 bytes
On Sun, 15 May 2005 18:05:10 +0000, Pasquale Imbemba wrote:

>> Indeed it would, but why would you think there are both a Quake and a
>> Quake2 newsgroup?  Why not use the right one?
 
> Hey, open your eyes: He *DID* choose the right one! :-)

You're even dumber than the OP.  He asked about "Quake" in the "Quake2"
newsgroup.  Open your fucking eyes and get a clue.

-- 
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951
Re: Need a cheat
#282642
Author: James Christie
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 21:20
31 lines
2628 bytes
In message <pan.2005.05.15.20.25.56.922236@invalid.lan>, Dan C 
<youmustbejoking@invalid.lan> writes
>On Sun, 15 May 2005 18:05:10 +0000, Pasquale Imbemba wrote:
>
>>> Indeed it would, but why would you think there are both a Quake and a
>>> Quake2 newsgroup?  Why not use the right one?
>
>> Hey, open your eyes: He *DID* choose the right one! :-)
>
>You're even dumber than the OP.  He asked about "Quake" in the "Quake2"
>newsgroup.  Open your fucking eyes and get a clue.
>

But the question he asked WAS about Quake 2, so he IS in the right ng. 
Everyone else managed to respond helpfully, but you're just hellbent on 
playing the arsehole, completely ignoring what has been posted and you 
have in fact been shown to being a total fuckwit.
Why don't YOU read the posts that the normal people in this ng posted in 
reply to the OP.
Quake questions have been posted in her before, and NOBODY has had a 
problem, except you, the newbie. You also conveniently bypass the point 
that the actual Quake ngs are completely dead.
If you're just going to be a sanctimonious arse, why don't you fuck off 
and stop bothering the rest of us.
-- 
Regards,

James Christie

"Luck is my middle name," he said, indistinctly.
"Mind you, my first name is Bad."
Re: Need a cheat
#282643
Author: Dan C
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 21:50
15 lines
1871 bytes
On Sun, 15 May 2005 22:20:24 +0100, James Christie wrote:

> But the question he asked WAS about Quake 2, so he IS in the right ng. 

His question said "Quake", and it was only clear that he meant Quake2
*well after* the fact.  True, or false? 

> If you're just going to be a sanctimonious arse, why don't you fuck off 
> and stop bothering the rest of us.

No need to be hostile about it.  How about you just fuck off yourself.

-- 
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951
Re: Need a cheat
#282645
Author: James Christie
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 22:05
28 lines
2390 bytes
In message <pan.2005.05.15.21.50.35.507832@invalid.lan>, Dan C 
<youmustbejoking@invalid.lan> writes
>On Sun, 15 May 2005 22:20:24 +0100, James Christie wrote:
>
>> But the question he asked WAS about Quake 2, so he IS in the right ng.
>
>His question said "Quake", and it was only clear that he meant Quake2
>*well after* the fact.  True, or false?
>

Does it matter? NOBODY else cares. It's not as if this ng is so chocka 
with messages that we have to be selective as to whats posted. And yet 
again you've ignored the point that this is one of the few Quake 
newsgroups (aside from Q3) which is till in use and not dormant.

>> If you're just going to be a sanctimonious arse, why don't you fuck off
>> and stop bothering the rest of us.
>
>No need to be hostile about it.  How about you just fuck off yourself.
>
You started it,
-- 
Regards,

James Christie

"Luck is my middle name," he said, indistinctly.
"Mind you, my first name is Bad."
Re: Need a cheat
#282651
Author: Doc_Johnson
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 02:20
14 lines
1808 bytes
On Sun, 15 May 2005 15:24:58 -0500, Dan C <youmustbejoking@invalid.lan> wrote:
>His original question said "Quake".  Go back and read it if you don't
>believe me.  This is the "Quake2" newsgroup.  What the fuck is so hard to
>figure out, genius?  

Damn inbred hardheaded hick, the guy had a question about q2. 

This is a q2 newsgroup dumbass get that thru your damn retarded assed brain or
shut the phuck up. 

Who the hell cares that you use Linux anyway, dumbest sig I have ever seen
blowhard. 

Doc  
Re: Need a cheat
#282652
Author: Dan C
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 03:44
27 lines
2131 bytes
On Sun, 15 May 2005 22:20:04 -0400, Doc_Johnson wrote:

>>His original question said "Quake".  Go back and read it if you don't
>>believe me.  This is the "Quake2" newsgroup.  What the fuck is so hard to
>>figure out, genius?  
 
> Damn inbred hardheaded hick, the guy had a question about q2. 

Damn, you're as ignorant as the other dumb son of a bitch.  Go fucking
look at the question, dipshit.  It said "Quake".  Mother of god, you
morons are stupid.
 
> This is a q2 newsgroup dumbass get that thru your damn retarded assed
> brain or shut the phuck up.

I know that, ignoramus.  That's EXACTLY why a question about "Quake" isn't
meant for this newsgroup.  What a fucking galoot.
 
> Who the hell cares that you use Linux anyway, dumbest sig I have ever
> seen blowhard.

Didn't ask if you cared, and that's got nothing to do with anything, ass
monkey.

-- 
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951
Re: Need a cheat
#282640
Author: McGrandpa
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 04:13
21 lines
2095 bytes
"James Christie" <james@christie.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:KB8NDZJ9$khCFwaR@christie.demon.co.uk
> In message <pan.2005.05.14.15.03.44.108902@invalid.lan>, Dan C
> <youmustbejoking@invalid.lan> writes
>> On Sat, 14 May 2005 09:40:12 -0500, Phil wrote:
>>
>>>> He should have been clear.  Don't defend sloppiness.
>>
>>>   Personally I thought you were nitpicking , if I posted a question
>>>   about a Ford in Chrysler newsgroup it would have been sloppy.
>>
>> Indeed it would, but why would you think there are both a Quake and a
>> Quake2 newsgroup?  Why not use the right one?
>>
>
> Because the Quake ng is dead, no posts*, nada. Get it?
>
> * Or very sporadic at best

ah-HAH!  You Looked, didn't ya, huh?  Din't ya!  LOL!
McG. 
Re: Need a cheat
#282648
Author: McGrandpa
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 04:19
28 lines
2436 bytes
"James Christie" <james@christie.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:kbemlBO2nPhCFwvy@christie.demon.co.uk
> In message <pan.2005.05.13.15.35.17.244304@invalid.lan>, Dan C
> <youmustbejoking@invalid.lan> writes
>> On Fri, 13 May 2005 14:07:37 +0000, Pasquale Imbemba wrote:
>>
>>>> Maybe you should ask in the Quake newsgroup?
>>
>>> So what's this ng about? ;-)
>>
>> You can't figure that out, from the name of the group?  Sheesh.
>>
>
> I think this group would be a good option for him, for the simple
> reason that most of, if not all the Quake newsgroups seem to be dead.
> I know, I've tried in the past, asking a question about Glquake, and
> received no reply (and there were no other posts in said ng either),
> whereas in here we have a pretty good lot who helpfully gave me a hand
> in solving my problem.

a.g.q3 is about the most active of the three main quake groups.  I look 
in all three as I'm still playing all three :)   It's so nice to be able 
to Load n Go, be fraggin something in 10 seconds or less :)  Not like 
bloated games like Far Cry that take a few minutes to load a level and 
be moving in the game.  Or Doom3 or HL2.
BTW, I just last week got GLQuake working great on my main rig.  Love 
it!
McG. 
Re: Need a cheat
#282653
Author: McGrandpa
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 04:21
28 lines
2374 bytes
"Dan C" <youmustbejoking@invalid.lan> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.05.16.03.44.35.64214@invalid.lan
> On Sun, 15 May 2005 22:20:04 -0400, Doc_Johnson wrote:
>
>>> His original question said "Quake".  Go back and read it if you
>>> don't believe me.  This is the "Quake2" newsgroup.  What the fuck
>>> is so hard to figure out, genius?
>
>> Damn inbred hardheaded hick, the guy had a question about q2.
>
> Damn, you're as ignorant as the other dumb son of a bitch.  Go fucking
> look at the question, dipshit.  It said "Quake".  Mother of god, you
> morons are stupid.
>
>> This is a q2 newsgroup dumbass get that thru your damn retarded assed
>> brain or shut the phuck up.
>
> I know that, ignoramus.  That's EXACTLY why a question about "Quake"
> isn't meant for this newsgroup.  What a fucking galoot.
>
>> Who the hell cares that you use Linux anyway, dumbest sig I have ever
>> seen blowhard.
>
> Didn't ask if you cared, and that's got nothing to do with anything,
> ass monkey.

Mmmm Hmmm.  Lookin bad now.  Shotties at dawn, ten paces Gents?  ;)
McG. 
Re: Need a cheat
#282619
Author: McGrandpa
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 04:22
21 lines
1446 bytes
"Dr. Mellow" <Mellow@spamblock.com> wrote in message
news:4284b62b$1_2@news.unc.edu
> Pasquale Imbemba wrote:
>> Dan C wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Maybe you should ask in the Quake newsgroup?
>>>
>>
>> So what's this ng about? ;-)
>>
>> Pasquale
>
> Quake "2," there are also Quake3 groups.
>
> How shoot red rope?
>
> Mellow

classic :)
McG. 
Re: Need a cheat
#282646
Author: Pasquale Imbemba
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 09:15
11 lines
1784 bytes
Dan C wrote:
> You're even dumber than the OP.  He asked about "Quake" in the "Quake2"
> newsgroup.  Open your fucking eyes and get a clue.

I suppose he refers to Quake 2: jailhouse. However, do something against 
your asocial behaviour: if insulting others gives you a happy time you 
must have gotten some trauma in your childhood.

Jesus.

Pasquale
Re: Need a cheat
#282658
Author: Pasquale Imbemba
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 09:16
10 lines
1479 bytes
Dan C wrote:
> 
> His original question said "Quake".  Go back and read it if you don't
> believe me.  This is the "Quake2" newsgroup.  What the fuck is so hard to
> figure out, genius?  
> 

You need therapy. Quick!

Pasquale
Re: Need a cheat
#282655
Author: Pasquale Imbemba
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 09:21
14 lines
1807 bytes
Dan C wrote:
> 
> Damn, you're as ignorant as the other dumb son of a bitch.  Go fucking
> look at the question, dipshit.  It said "Quake".  Mother of god, you
> morons are stupid.

Hmm. Yeah, you gut "nuts" or what? I guess you must be the dumbest guy 
around if you keep on insulting for free. If you can't communicate to 
others in a proper tone, there is something wrong with you. Badly.

[X] Plonk
[X] FOAD

Pasquale
Re: Need a cheat
#282656
Author: Pasquale Imbemba
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 09:23
16 lines
1798 bytes
Dan C wrote:

> 
> 
> Damn, you're as ignorant as the other dumb son of a bitch.  Go fucking
> look at the question, dipshit.  It said "Quake".  Mother of god, you
> morons are stupid.

Hmm. Yeah, you got "nuts" or what? I guess you must be the dumbest guy 
around if you keep on insulting for free. If you can't communicate to 
others in a proper tone, there is something wrong with you. Badly.

[X] Plonk
[X] FOAD

Pasquale
Re: Need a cheat
#282657
Author: Pasquale Imbemba
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 09:23
14 lines
1870 bytes
Dan C wrote:

> Damn, you're as ignorant as the other dumb son of a bitch.  Go fucking
> look at the question, dipshit.  It said "Quake".  Mother of god, you
> morons are stupid.

Hmm. Yeah, you gut "nuts" or what? I guess you must be the dumbest guy 
around if you keep on insulting for free. If you can't communicate to 
others in a proper tone, there is something wrong with you. Badly.

[X] Plonk
[X] FOAD

Pasquale
Re: Need a cheat
#282654
Author: Margolis
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 18:54
14 lines
1632 bytes
"McGrandpa" <McGrandpaNOT@NOThotmail.com> >
> Mmmm Hmmm.  Lookin bad now.  Shotties at dawn, ten paces Gents?  ;)
> McG.
>

lol

It certainly seems 'somebody' opened a big can of worms ;op

-- 

Margolis
http://web.archive.org/web/20030215212142/http://www.agqx.org/faqs/AGQ2FAQ.htm
http://www.unrealtower.org/faq
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads