Article View: alt.games.quake2
Article #603Re: Pure3d vs Monster3d
From: Gary Ambrose
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 00:00
15 lines
978 bytes
978 bytes
Bozkurt wrote: > > Right about the extra memory for textures. Think Ill probally go > with > > this card as opposed to the diamond monster. > > If theres no differance other then the output to TV function Ill > take > > the pure3d. > > From which manufacturer is Pure 3D? > > It's from Canopus Gary A
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<343F754B.751D1727@cableinet.co.uk>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<34372F1C.FE@metrolink.net> <61cbf5$pqu@redtail.cruzio.com> <3439CBCE.1916@metrolink.net> <343BCDC2.3312@ABG2.X400.sni.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: Gary Ambrose <g.am...@cableinet.co.uk> Subject: Re: Pure3d vs Monster3d Date: 1997/10/11 Message-ID: <343F754B.751D1727@cableinet.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 279538472 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: usr69-bas.cableinet.co.uk References: <34372F1C.FE@metrolink.net> <61cbf5$pqu@redtail.cruzio.com> <3439CBCE.1916@metrolink.net> <343BCDC2.3312@ABG2.X400.sni.de> To: Bozkurt <BERKANT...@ABG2.X400.sni.de> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Organization: "Cable Internet (post doesn't reflect views of Cable Internet)" Reply-To: g.am...@cableinet.co.uk Newsgroups: alt.games.quake2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit