Article View: alt.games.quake2
Article #599Re: Pure3d vs Monster3d
From: Bozkurt
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 00:00
9 lines
691 bytes
691 bytes
> Right about the extra memory for textures. Think Ill probally go with > this card as opposed to the diamond monster. > If theres no differance other then the output to TV function Ill take > the pure3d. >From which manufacturer is Pure 3D? Berkant
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<343BCDC2.3312@ABG2.X400.sni.de>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<34372F1C.FE@metrolink.net> <61cbf5$pqu@redtail.cruzio.com> <3439CBCE.1916@metrolink.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: Bozkurt <BERKANT...@ABG2.X400.sni.de> Subject: Re: Pure3d vs Monster3d Date: 1997/10/08 Message-ID: <343BCDC2.3312@ABG2.X400.sni.de> X-Deja-AN: 278738445 References: <34372F1C.FE@metrolink.net> <61cbf5$pqu@redtail.cruzio.com> <3439CBCE.1916@metrolink.net> Organization: Siemens Nixdorf Inc. Newsgroups: alt.games.quake2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit