Re: Monster 3D or Matrox Mystique?

Article View: alt.games.quake2

Article #594

#594

From: davi... davieboy
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 00:00

7 lines
736 bytes

To the original sender:

the Matrox Mystique is fine if you want good 2D and ok 3D graphics,
however go for the Monster 3D if you want killer 3D graphics. Keep in
mind you'll need another card to take care of the 2D graphics (if you
decide to go with the Monster 3D).

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3452ba27.7541481@news.direct.ca>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <MPG.ea0534f61fb6f1a9899c6@news.texas.net> <62hb0s$37s$1@ns2.umkc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: davi...@geocities.com (davieboy)
Subject: Re: Monster 3D or Matrox Mystique?
Date: 1997/10/26
Message-ID: <3452ba27.7541481@news.direct.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 285002146
References: <MPG.ea0534f61fb6f1a9899c6@news.texas.net> <62hb0s$37s$1@ns2.umkc.edu>
Organization: Canada Internet Direct, Inc.
Newsgroups: 3dfx.games.glquake,alt.games.quake,alt.games.quake2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message