Re: Quake2-->better than Duke3d?

Article View: alt.games.quake2

Article #334

#334

From: po... poop
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 00:00

10 lines
883 bytes

Can you say......."troll"?   This guy wants attention, and I'm sorry
I've given him even this much.
On Sun, 25 Aug 1997 00:20:30 -0600, hat...@rocketmail.com (hathead)
wrote:

>Just checked out all the screen shots and it doesn't look like this one will 
>come close either.  Hopefully it will be better when it comes out.  It will 
>probably be worth the 50MB download from alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc but I 
>certainly don't plan on paying any real money for it.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3403770d.3442092@news.mindspring.com>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <quke2@will.be.lame>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: po...@mindspring.com (poop)
Subject: Re: Quake2-->better than Duke3d?
Date: 1997/08/27
Message-ID: <3403770d.3442092@news.mindspring.com>
X-Deja-AN: 268678160
References: <quke2@will.be.lame>
X-Server-Date: 28 Aug 1997 00:41:02 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
Newsgroups: alt.games.quake2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message