Article View: alt.games.quake
Article #76077Re: MATROX MILLENNIUM or MYSTIQUE? HELP!!
From: m... Scott McDonald
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 00:00
16 lines
1230 bytes
1230 bytes
Rod M Ratsma <rod.r...@dial.pipex.com> wrote: >> heard that the Mystique card is fastest in 3D graphics and reports better >> benchs over DOS tests. > >For 3D games, the Mystique is a better card. > >Rod M Ratsma (London, UK) Unfortunately, however, the S3 chip being used by Matrox may not support all functions of the new Direct X 3.0 standard being implemented by Intel. And of course, it may not be "up to" the new MMX-standards as well. For more on this issue visit the Matrox website and read their statement about 3-D games (www.matrox.com)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32dd18ba.2400980@news.community.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<01bc01b8$270ffa20$716ab3c2@~load.redestb.es> <VA.0000023c.00282014@default>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: m...@community.net (Scott McDonald) Subject: Re: MATROX MILLENNIUM or MYSTIQUE? HELP!! Date: 1997/01/14 Message-ID: <32dd18ba.2400980@news.community.net> X-Deja-AN: 210073979 references: <01bc01b8$270ffa20$716ab3c2@~load.redestb.es> <VA.0000023c.00282014@default> organization: Digital America mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,alt.3d,alt.3d.misc,alt.binaries.games.quake,alt.games.duke3d,alt.games.quake,alt.games.upcoming-3d,alt.graphics,alt.windows95,comp.graphics.apps.photoshop,comp.graphics.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.video,comp.simulatio Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit