🚀 go-pugleaf

Dan C kissed my ass and whined:

>On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:25:03 +0000, ANC wrote:
>
>> If this IS a community, than I can only suggest that it is one without a
>> construct of moral values. I can't think of any other (distro, not
>> advocacy/political) group that would allow the kinds of things that Dan C
>> posts to go unchallenged.
>
>Did you ever wonder, Al, why you seem to be the only one who objects? 
>Doesn't that strike you as odd?

You strike me as odd, and quite stupid.
>
>>> What if you percieve it like this: the NG's for other distros are
>>> where the sheep roam, while this place is where the wolves run free.
>>> There is a natural barrier that prevents the sheep from being eaten by
>>> the wolves unless they wander astray and end up in a.o.l.s.
>>> Apart from this, wolves with a sense of morality are known to exist.
> 
>> You make a romantic "Lockeian" picture of life in the state of nature... the
>> noble savage, etc.
>
>And he's right on the money.  Admit it.
>
>> I tend toward a more "Hobbisan" approach... having seen
>> first hand how fast a society can degenerate to their baser instincts once
>> law (or respect for law) is removed.
>
>Really?  Where'd you see that, Al?  Are you referring to your "adventures"
>during the Vietnam era, when you and your dope-smoking pals were rioting
>in the streets?
>
>> I think you have every right to the above. But do you condone showing them a
>> hurtful attitude? Do you endorse the kinds of things that Dan C posts? 
>
>Most of the "negative" things I post are in response to your trolling and
>inflammatory comments.  You quit, I quit.
> 
Try suicide instead.  Post your obituary first so we can all have a
good chuckle.

:)