🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4cf45h$8...@steel.interlog.com>,
Bren Lynne <Sb...@interlog.com> wrote:

>In article <4cd5qb$2...@drencrom.insync.net>,
>   Cant tell ya <no...@unknown.org> wrote:
>>I keep hearing people say the Into the shadows demo thing looks like
>>shit.  How much ram do you guys have and what kind of CPU do you got??
>>The Into the shadows has better texture mapping and lighting than
>>descent or any other game I have seen, the anti-aliasing is also
>>excellent. Maybe you need a lot of ram for the texture maps? 
>>Did it look really good to anyone else with a p-100 and lots of RAM??
>
>I got a 486DX/2 with 8 megs RAM, BUT I got 256k cache and 2 megs on the video 
>card.  Wouldm't believe what a difference those two make to a 128k with 1 meg. 
>BIG difference.  I think the ITS demo looks fabulous, though I wouldn't try to 
>play the game on my machine, honestly.  I was getting maybe 10-12 fps and still 
>thought it was terrific.

I got a i486DX4/100 with 32 Megs and a Matrox Millennium PCI 4MB and IMO this
demo runs very good.. hmm hard to count FPS but i'd guess its about 20 to
25. It looks awesome :)

See ya,
Lutz.

-------------------------------------------------------------
Lutz Heinrichs        E-Mail..: hans...@fireball.tng.oche.de
Aachen, Germany       voice...: +49 2408 5769
                      fax.....: +49 2408 5544