Re: Quake!.

Article View: alt.games.quake

Article #1634

#1634

From: rgoo... Robert Goodwin
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 1996 00:00

17 lines
1127 bytes

afro...@mercury.uah.ualberta.ca (Al Froehler) wrote:

>	I'm a little new at this and I don't understand a lot of 
>what you guys are talking about but apparently quake is supposed 
>to be a great game.  I.ve read a lot in this newsgroup and 
>everyone is arguing over which games is better and almost 
>everyone agrees that quake should be good.  However I have yet 
>to hear from anyone - friends and quake enthusiastes(?) alike - 
>what this quake game is like. Is it a Heretic type game or 
>doom2 type game?  Good? maybe, but I'd really like to know a 
>little more about before I agree or disagree.  Anyone? 

This "quake game" doesn't exist yet!  Due out this summer (hopefully).
Get back to us then.

-- Robert Goodwin
-- http://ro.com/~rgoodwin/

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4cdqhs$iak@news.ro.com>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4caq3k$1rrq@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: rgoo...@ro.com (Robert Goodwin)
Subject: Re: Quake!.
Date: 1996/01/03
Message-ID: <4cdqhs$iak@news.ro.com>
X-Deja-AN: 133796494
references: <4caq3k$1rrq@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca>
organization: RENAISSANCE INTERNET SERVICES
newsgroups: alt.games.quake
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message