🚀 go-pugleaf

In <22ruac$o...@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> bc...@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Marc R. Klenotic) writes:


>Mortal Kombat is scheduled to be released in September by
>Acclaim Entertainment.  However, the SNES version will be "blood-less"
>unless we do something about it.

WRONG!  Here is what I know:

"Over the past several months, you've probably heard an earful of rumors about
Acclaim's adaptation of Mortal Kombat for the Super NES.  The loudest of these
myths is that Mortal Kombat will be made into some wimpy shadow of its arcade
self.  At Pak Watch (an article in a magazine), we thought you should be the
judge.  Check out these fantastic shots.  (Shows pictures of graphics from the
game that look like the arcade in all ways ... background, and forground).  Not
only are the arcade-quality graphics preserved, but the dramatic and rather 
graphic nature of the game play is virtually unchanged.  Out sources report 
that only three moves were replaced.  The way this Pak Watcher looks at it, a 
little variety never hurts anything.  Of course, not everyone agrees.  There 
has been talk of some people who are ready to rip out their own spines to prove how cool they are!  Seems rather spineless to us!  But even more important 
than the debate over the original game's Fatality Moves in the superior play
control and graphics of the Super NES, which will make this home video game version of Mortal Kombat the most fun to play."

						-Nintendo Power
 					           July   Volume 50

Just thought you might like to know that!   >8-)

Jesse Waldack
 
 

In a previous article, fl...@moby.micro.umn.edu (Jesse R. Waldack) says:

>In <22ruac$o...@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> bc...@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Marc R. Klenotic) writes:
>
>
>>Mortal Kombat is scheduled to be released in September by
>>Acclaim Entertainment.  However, the SNES version will be "blood-less"
>>unless we do something about it.
>
>WRONG!  Here is what I know:
>
>"Over the past several months, you've probably heard an earful of rumors about
>Acclaim's adaptation of Mortal Kombat for the Super NES.  The loudest of these
>myths is that Mortal Kombat will be made into some wimpy shadow of its arcade
>self.  At Pak Watch (an article in a magazine), we thought you should be the
>judge.  Check out these fantastic shots.  (Shows pictures of graphics from the
>game that look like the arcade in all ways ... background, and forground).  Not

     How about the blood?  That's what was supposed to be removed.  And
the programmer's heads on the stakes in the pit?  Are those still there?

>only are the arcade-quality graphics preserved, but the dramatic and rather 
>graphic nature of the game play is virtually unchanged.  Out sources report 
>that only three moves were replaced.  The way this Pak Watcher looks at it, a 
>little variety never hurts anything.  Of course, not everyone agrees.  There 
>has been talk of some people who are ready to rip out their own spines to prove how cool they are!  Seems rather spineless to us!  But even more important 
>than the debate over the original game's Fatality Moves in the superior play
>control and graphics of the Super NES, which will make this home video game version of Mortal Kombat the most fun to play."
>
>						-Nintendo Power
                                                 ^^^^^^^^
     Well, just so long as this info is from a good, unbiased source...
;-)

     Seriously, I used to read Nintendo Power and I wasn't really
impressed.  The only games that existed in its pages were Nintendo
games (no 3rd party games) and all games were great (according to them.)
I never read a bad thing about any game.

     Anyway, I'd take this with a grain of salt.  Nintendo will say
anything to sell its games.

Andy


-- 
Andy Berkvam                          |  Few are wholly dead:
U of Wisconsin - Stevens Point        |  Blow on a dead man's embers
Cleveland Freenet: bq274              |  And a live flame will start.
Internet: aber...@spu1.uwsp.edu      |                -Robert Graves

Nintendo Power is always an unbiased opinion of games and hardware 
for the Super NES...


NOT!