🚀 go-pugleaf

"Hiro Protagonist" scrawled:

>I take it you have never had a class on "the US Government".  The Supreme
>court does _not_ decide what is "right or wrong" nor what is a "good law or
>bad law", rather it determines whether a law is constitutional -- nothing
>more -- nothing less.  The Brady bill case (or its constitutionality) has
>nothing to do with guns and background check. 

Good law is constitutional.
Bad law is unconstitutional.
While the Supreme Court left intact a good portion of the 
Brady Bill, they struck down the Fed's attempt to force
mandatory backround checks, which would be executed and 
paid for by the states. 

Show me the chapter you apparently
skipped over, and read to me where I fucked up.

> It is about the federal
>governments right to force states to use state resources to enforce federal
>laws.

See above.

>  Its was struck down on these grounds alone and personally I think
>this was not only the right decision but most important decision of the
>week. 

Out of all the rulings last week that in one way or another 
gave more voice to the throats of the states, you're enthralled
with one redneck's crusade to avoid the service charges of checking
out John Q. Hayseed's rap-sheet, huh? 


> Think of the bigger picture here-

Yeah, and when you finally open yer eyes, look around,
and think "Tobacco Settlement" and realize you're
so far off-base, you're out of bounds...

Corporations run states. And the state runs you.



Capt. Meat