🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <5am6d0$m...@bertrand.ccs.carleton.ca>, Will Sitch
<wsi...@engsoc.carleton.ca> writes
>The idea behind flaming spammers such as these is to stop the messages
>that clutter up newsgroups.  Therefore, replying to his message
>_in_the_newsgroup_ is a silly thing to do.  Reply to his message (ccing
>his postm...@site.com) and flame him. 

Flame the creeps by all means, but don't expect their postmaster to help
if you flame them as well, or go over the top with your flaming.

Remember, the sysadmins at the offending site can do something far more
effective that flame the user, they can blow the offending account(s)
away. (Why use a flamethrower, when you can call up a tactical nuke ?)

But they'll only do it if you have a *genuine* complaint, and don't
descend to the offender's level.
-- 
Chris King
ch...@csking.demon.co.uk