🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.mk
Article #74796

Re: that sub fatal...

#74796
From: JRF
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:35
37 lines
3082 bytes
i agree


"Trash" <tr...@mkx.org> wrote in message
news:3d618176.959062@news.pa.comcast.giganews.com...
> saw the pic of the sub fatal for MK:DA....looks cool.......BUT...i
> thought BOON said no rehash fatals? now before all the boon
> ass-kissers and trash-haters respond and somehow come up with it isnt
> a rehash.......put aside yer bias ass opinons and just realize that
> once again boon was wrong in telling us something 348734278234 months
> before the game came out.
>
> kano had the skeleton rip fatal in MK3...and i'm sure it won't look
> quite the same or be exactly the same...its still a rehash. By him
> saying there will be "ALL NEW" fatals, i want ALL NEW fatals. not a
> modification of one.
>
> if he wanted to still give some of the old characters their original
> fatals...but make them different to please the fans (I really dont
> care, i'de like for some of the originals to have there old fatals,
> along with new ones) he shoulda did something totally bad ass like
> make sub rip out yer spine thru yer ass or something.
>
> but no matter how you look at it, its one we have seen before...just
> simply modified a bit...ugh. He should have never made that
> comment...but like anyone pimping something they want ppl to buy, they
> will say anything...we'll see how it all goes down soon...
>
> I would have liked for all the original 7 character to have their
> original fatal, plus new ones...and i guess some of the old characters
> from MK2-MK4 to keep any fatals that kicked ass....like the quan leg
> rip...but not the lame ones for cyrax. just to make my point clear for
> all the morons who would suck boon's dick to know the true origin of
> sub zero and scorpion, i'm only saying it was said there would be no
> rehashes.....if some mag just made that up or some other source and
> boon didnt say it, he should have corrected it...but it was said..by
> someone and the fisrt fatal we see is one we saw before....
Technical Details
Message-ID: <s9g89.116008$Yd.4977539@twister.austin.rr.com>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.telusplanet.net!peer1-sjc1.usenetserver.com.MISMATCH!ps01-sjc1!news.webusenet.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone.austin.rr.com!twister.austin.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <3d618176.959062@news.pa.comcast.giganews.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.telusplanet.net!peer1-sjc1.usenetserver.com.MISMATCH!ps01-sjc1!news.webusenet.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone.austin.rr.com!twister.austin.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "JRF" <jrf...@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.games.mk
References: <3d618176.959062@news.pa.comcast.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: that sub fatal...
Lines: 39
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <s9g89.116008$Yd.4977539@twister.austin.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:35:36 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.243.238.148
X-Complaints-To: ab...@rr.com
X-Trace: twister.austin.rr.com 1029803736 24.243.238.148 (Mon, 19 Aug 2002 19:35:36 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 19:35:36 CDT
Organization: Road Runner - Texas
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit