🚀 go-pugleaf

( Sutaz ) wrote:
> 
> well, i will only comment on the people's icon's post about the blur.
> its blurry simply because most games are in low-resolution.
> anti-aliasing creates the fuzz if its over-used. but why am i even
> commenting you cant even call it the N64 which would be a clear sign of
> a hater.

Oh, ok.  Nintendo64.  N64.  As for lo res, I don't know.  Would you want
a game full of annoying jaggies like say Fighters Megamix, or would you
like blurro-vision?  I guess the blur would be better. 

> 
> anyhoo, i did not commemt on the dreamcast beause i do not care about
> it. sega bombed far too many times. i will stick with the psx 2 for
> hopes of the next great system after N64 and psx (dreaming of a great
> home port of Soul Calibur)
> 

Is the people's ICON gonna buy a Dreamcast right away? Hell no. Right
now there's so little games worth anything except pretty graphics which
you see on the PC anyways.  PSX2....hrm, sony got their beginner's luck
so the next try might not be so lucky.  Nintendo and Sega has a past
whilst PSX was sony's first system so they have a clean streak going so
far. 

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Su...@webtv.net
>