Thread View: alt.games.microprose.transport-tyc
7 messages
7 total messages
Started by Shatter
Sat, 07 Aug 1999 00:00
Contest Stats ( not finished )
Author: Shatter
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 00:00
4 lines
613 bytes
613 bytes
Well, lets post some ideas for this contest. Chris, make your site avaiable, and as soon as the contest is set, we go for it, we will make a random map ( possible scenario ) and the one with the most success by 2050 wins? Sounds good enough to me.
Re: Contest Stats ( not finished )
Author: mr...
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 00:00
14 lines
1031 bytes
1031 bytes
Shatter wrote: > > Well, lets post some ideas for this contest. Chris, make your site > avaiable, and as soon as the contest is set, we go for it, we will make a > random map ( possible scenario ) and the one with the most success by 2050 > wins? Sounds good enough to me. Why can we just have to year 2000 or something??? The game is pretty borring at the 50 years!!! Or we could have both!!! Best by 2000 and 2050??? --- Mr.XL mr...@usa.net
Re: Contest Stats ( not finished )
Author: Chris locke
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 00:00
8 lines
1019 bytes
1019 bytes
Apologies for delay in replying. I've suggested people email me the games every 5years so I can compile a "league" table, but it looks as though this has been changed to 20 years. We'll see how we go, to be honest. If it looks as though there is a clear winner by 2000, we'll end there - or fight it out to 2050 - and maybe beyond?! I'm all for that!!!!
Re: Contest Stats ( not finished )
Author: K
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:00
14 lines
1312 bytes
1312 bytes
Chris locke <mcmu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:934495842.13331.0.nnrp-06.c1ed2dd7@news.demon.co.uk... > Apologies for delay in replying. > > I've suggested people email me the games every 5years so I can compile a > "league" table, but it looks as though this has been changed to 20 years. > > We'll see how we go, to be honest. If it looks as though there is a clear > winner by 2000, we'll end there - or fight it out to 2050 - and maybe > beyond?! I'm all for that!!!! > Why does the competition have to end. Why can't we just see who gets the highest scores.
Re: Contest Stats ( not finished )
Author: Chris locke
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 00:00
8 lines
960 bytes
960 bytes
>Why does the competition have to end. It has to end at *some* point for there to be a winner... Then another one begins....... :) (thats assuming this dumb bloke Chris puts that scenario on his site...)
Re: Contest Stats ( not finished )
Author: K
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00
8 lines
1109 bytes
1109 bytes
Chris locke <mcmu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:935015762.28202.0.nnrp-04.c1ed2dd7@news.demon.co.uk... > >Why does the competition have to end. > It has to end at *some* point for there to be a winner... > Then another one begins....... > Why can't we just have a "Top 20" list?
Re: Contest Stats ( not finished )
Author: Chris locke
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00
3 lines
878 bytes
878 bytes
Dunno. You want it, I'll do it. (ooer)
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads