🚀 go-pugleaf

ervaqre schreef op 29-8-2015 20:36:
>> it's been a while. had to compile a command-line
>> client to even get back in (tin 2.2.1). what've
>> I been up to? stuff. nanowrimo, for example.
>> wrote a novel in 2012 called 'from within'. it
>> is officially available from amazon, but others
>> stores seem to be reselling it for a profit.
>
> 你舌头太长了，孩子！
>
I haven't been 16 in a long while, the RRRRR is wrong on that. And I'm 
not Gene Simmons either.

-- 
Danny.

ervaqre schreef op 1-9-2015 1:51:
>>>
>>> 你舌头太长了，孩子！
>>>
>> I haven't been 16 in a long while, the RRRRR is wrong on that. And I'm
>> not Gene Simmons either.
>
> I don't believe this is the thread where we reply with totally
> unrelated nonsense. Poor Esben will be totally confused, not having
> been to Aglami for more than 10 years. He might even think this place
> has become a House for the Drunkards and Salty Lunatics!
>
You mean crazy pirates? Seems on topic, sorta, even.

-- 
Danny.

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 19:27:56 +0000 (UTC), anon...@aioe.org (e.g.
krebs) wrote:

>it's been a while. had to compile a command-line
>client to even get back in (tin 2.2.1). what've
>I been up to? stuff. nanowrimo, for example.
>wrote a novel in 2012 called 'from within'. it
>is officially available from amazon, but others
>stores seem to be reselling it for a profit.

OMG


-- 
pixel 


"This song is for the guy who keeps 
    yelling from the balcony, and it's 
    called 'we hate you, please die." 

ervaqre schreef op 10-9-2015 11:00:
>>> I don't believe this is the thread where we reply with totally
>>> unrelated nonsense. Poor Esben will be totally confused, not having
>>> been to Aglami for more than 10 years. He might even think this place
>>> has become a House for the Drunkards and Salty Lunatics!
>>>
>> You mean crazy pirates? Seems on topic, sorta, even.
>
> I guess that's why this thread doesn't have an [OT]-tag. Seriously,
> the [OT]-tag was the best invention ever.
>
No [OT]-tag, that was unusually foresighted. Then again, if a thread 
goes on long enough the chances increase that someone says something on 
topic. Even if accidentally. It's probably a Usenet law or law of 
probability.

-- 
Danny.

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:01:17 +0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:

>>>it's been a while. had to compile a command-line
>>>client to even get back in (tin 2.2.1). what've
>>>I been up to? stuff. nanowrimo, for example.
>>>wrote a novel in 2012 called 'from within'. it
>>>is officially available from amazon, but others
>>>stores seem to be reselling it for a profit.
>>
>> OMG
>
>Whose job was it again to say: "They all come back! BWAAHAHAHA!!" ?

Someone who never came back?

Luke?


-- 
pixel 


"This song is for the guy who keeps 
    yelling from the balcony, and it's 
    called 'we hate you, please die." 

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 22:40:44 +0200, DG
<dammyge...@censored.zzn.com> wrote:

>>>> I don't believe this is the thread where we reply with totally
>>>> unrelated nonsense. Poor Esben will be totally confused, not having
>>>> been to Aglami for more than 10 years. He might even think this place
>>>> has become a House for the Drunkards and Salty Lunatics!
>>>>
>>> You mean crazy pirates? Seems on topic, sorta, even.
>>
>> I guess that's why this thread doesn't have an [OT]-tag. Seriously,
>> the [OT]-tag was the best invention ever.
>>
>No [OT]-tag, that was unusually foresighted. Then again, if a thread 
>goes on long enough the chances increase that someone says something on 
>topic. Even if accidentally. It's probably a Usenet law or law of 
>probability.

The [OT}-tag was for post that were _on_ topic, wasn't it?


-- 
pixel 


"This song is for the guy who keeps 
    yelling from the balcony, and it's 
    called 'we hate you, please die." 

Pixel "#~ schreef op 19-9-2015 16:12:
>>>> You mean crazy pirates? Seems on topic, sorta, even.
>>>
>>> I guess that's why this thread doesn't have an [OT]-tag. Seriously,
>>> the [OT]-tag was the best invention ever.
>>>
>> No [OT]-tag, that was unusually foresighted. Then again, if a thread
>> goes on long enough the chances increase that someone says something on
>> topic. Even if accidentally. It's probably a Usenet law or law of
>> probability.
>
> The [OT}-tag was for post that were _on_ topic, wasn't it?
>
>
OT! Not OT. Oh, wait, that was pine.

-- 
Danny.

ervaqre schreef op 30-12-2015 2:20:
>>>> No [OT]-tag, that was unusually foresighted. Then again, if a thread
>>>> goes on long enough the chances increase that someone says something on
>>>> topic. Even if accidentally. It's probably a Usenet law or law of
>>>> probability.
>>>
>>> The [OT}-tag was for post that were _on_ topic, wasn't it?
>>>
>> OT! Not OT. Oh, wait, that was pine.
>
> I am getting so sick of thise pine thing. How about we introduce a
> [PINE] tag so that I can filter all threads about pine? There! I did
> it. It's official now. So talk about pine all you want!
>
Of course when we're not talking about pine, but pine, we don't need the 
[PINE] tag. So good thing I removed it. We wouldn't want you to miss out.

-- 
Danny.

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 01:20:19 -0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:

>>>> No [OT]-tag, that was unusually foresighted. Then again, if a thread
>>>> goes on long enough the chances increase that someone says something on
>>>> topic. Even if accidentally. It's probably a Usenet law or law of
>>>> probability.
>>>
>>> The [OT}-tag was for post that were _on_ topic, wasn't it?
>>>
>> OT! Not OT. Oh, wait, that was pine.
>
>I am getting so sick of thise pine thing. How about we introduce a 
>[PINE] tag so that I can filter all threads about pine? There! I did 
>it. It's official now. So talk about pine all you want!

Why did you spell pine wrong?


-- 
pixel 


"This song is for the guy who keeps 
    yelling from the balcony, and it's 
    called 'we hate you, please die." 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 01:25:11 -0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:

>>>Whose job was it again to say: "They all come back! BWAAHAHAHA!!" ?
>>
>> Someone who never came back?
>>
>> Luke?
>
>How about we start the Furious Aglamian Retrieval Team, the FART. Then 
>we locate all Aglamians who never came back, abduct them and then put 
>them in little boxes underneath the sink. OK SO HOW ABOUT IT!! I AM 
>GETTING ALL EXCITED!! WHOO!!
>
>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour 
>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.

Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
I like that.
Acronym of the day...


-- 
pixel 


"This song is for the guy who keeps 
    yelling from the balcony, and it's 
    called 'we hate you, please die." 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:08:36 +0100, "Pixel \"#~" <m...@me.com> wrote:

>>> Someone who never came back?
>>>
>>> Luke?
>>
>>How about we start the Furious Aglamian Retrieval Team, the FART. Then 
>>we locate all Aglamians who never came back, abduct them and then put 
>>them in little boxes underneath the sink. OK SO HOW ABOUT IT!! I AM 
>>GETTING ALL EXCITED!! WHOO!!
>>
>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour 
>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>
>Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>I like that.
>Acronym of the day...


Oh, and Mike Ball asks if that is a APF-department..


-- 
pixel 


"This song is for the guy who keeps 
    yelling from the balcony, and it's 
    called 'we hate you, please die." 

ervaqre schreef op 2-1-2016 2:37:
>>>> OT! Not OT. Oh, wait, that was pine.
>>>
>>> I am getting so sick of thise pine thing. How about we introduce a
>>> [PINE] tag so that I can filter all threads about pine? There! I did
>>> it. It's official now. So talk about pine all you want!
>>>
>> Of course when we're not talking about pine, but pine, we don't need the
>> [PINE] tag. So good thing I removed it. We wouldn't want you to miss out.
>
> Since you talked about pine instead of pine, I had to insert the
> [PINE] tag once more. After all, this thread is about pine. Next time
> you want to talk about pine rather than pine, please learn how to
> spell. It is 'pine' and not 'pine'!!!!
>
Damn you! Auto correct!!!

-- 
Danny.

ervaqre schreef op 2-1-2016 2:38:
>>>> OT! Not OT. Oh, wait, that was pine.
>>>
>>> I am getting so sick of thise pine thing. How about we introduce a
>>> [PINE] tag so that I can filter all threads about pine? There! I did
>>> it. It's official now. So talk about pine all you want!
>>
>> Why did you spell pine wrong?
>
> This thread has the official Aglami [PINE] tag. I am ignoring it!
>
Good job ignoring it.

-- 
Danny.

On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 01:50:19 -0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:

>Pixel "#~ is a mighty pirate...
>
>>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour 
>>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>>
>>>Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>>>I like that.
>>>Acronym of the day...
>>
>> Oh, and Mike Ball asks if that is a APF-department..
>
>Okay, so you communicate with Aglamians outside of Aglami? 
>You do realize the penalty for that is DEATH, don't you?

We have a parallel Aglami on Facebook. Didn't you know?

-- 
Kasper

On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 01:50:19 -0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:

>>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour 
>>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>>
>>>Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>>>I like that.
>>>Acronym of the day...
>>
>> Oh, and Mike Ball asks if that is a APF-department..
>
>Okay, so you communicate with Aglamians outside of Aglami? 
>You do realize the penalty for that is DEATH, don't you?

I communicate with you outside of Aglami, don't I?

>Anyway, ask him if he still has my weewaa site please, the one with 
>the epileptic attack, the list of people going to Mafraan and the glow 
>in the dark menu at the bottom. I seem to have lost that wonderful 
>piece of art and I believe he keeps a .zip copy of it in his 
>underpants.

Question sent.


-- 
pixel 


"This song is for the guy who keeps 
    yelling from the balcony, and it's 
    called 'we hate you, please die." 

On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 17:48:30 +0100, Kasper <nos...@thanks.com> wrote:

>>>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour 
>>>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>>>
>>>>Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>>>>I like that.
>>>>Acronym of the day...
>>>
>>> Oh, and Mike Ball asks if that is a APF-department..
>>
>>Okay, so you communicate with Aglamians outside of Aglami? 
>>You do realize the penalty for that is DEATH, don't you?
>
>We have a parallel Aglami on Facebook. Didn't you know?

Yeah, there is like a group thing that nobody ever posts to.
It's like almost exactly like the real Aglami in that way...


-- 
pixel 


"This song is for the guy who keeps 
    yelling from the balcony, and it's 
    called 'we hate you, please die." 

On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 01:38:57 -0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:

>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour 
>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>
>> Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>> I like that.
>> Acronym of the day...
>
>Okay, now get to work! Throw your baby aside and be a real ultimate 
>detective! We need to retrieve those who never returned!!

Well, _WHO_ never returned?


-- 
pixel 


"This song is for the guy who keeps 
    yelling from the balcony, and it's 
    called 'we hate you, please die." 

On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 18:05:31 +0100, "Pixel \"#~" <m...@me.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 01:38:57 -0000 (UTC), ervaqre <m...@privacy.net>
>wrote:
>
>>>>Or we could phone them and say: "Bwahahahaha!!! I will now devour 
>>>>you!!" I've always wanted to do that.
>>>
>>> Furious Aglami Retrieval Team.
>>> I like that.
>>> Acronym of the day...
>>
>>Okay, now get to work! Throw your baby aside and be a real ultimate 
>>detective! We need to retrieve those who never returned!!
>
>Well, _WHO_ never returned?

They always come back.

-- 
Kasper