Thread View: alt.games.lucas-arts.monkey-island
56 messages
56 total messages
Page 1 of 2
Started by DG
Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:31
Page 1 of 2 ⢠56 total messages
Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:31
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:31
9 lines
1350 bytes
1350 bytes
For some reason Pixel's latest posts show up with a "Bad article number" error. None of the content gets displayed. Besides the error there is also a message saying the message may have expired. Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down the pipes he shouldn't have? -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Sean
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:04
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:04
9 lines
1596 bytes
1596 bytes
DG skrev: > For some reason Pixel's latest posts show up with a "Bad article number" > error. None of the content gets displayed. Besides the error there is > also a message saying the message may have expired. > > Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down the > pipes he shouldn't have? He works fine for me.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:54
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:54
20 lines
1968 bytes
1968 bytes
Sean schreef: >> For some reason Pixel's latest posts show up with a "Bad article >> number" error. None of the content gets displayed. Besides the error >> there is also a message saying the message may have expired. >> >> Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down the >> pipes he shouldn't have? > > He works fine for me. Found a couple of workarounds. Turns out I can see his posts if I look at the source of the post, they then appear in my Thunderbird. Pressing reply however results in a blanc e-mail to Pixel, not a quoting reply into Aglami. I haven't quite worked out if it's a Thunderbug or a Motzerellabug. I wonder what will happen next time Pixel does something silly like posting. -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Sean
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:16
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:16
21 lines
2152 bytes
2152 bytes
DG skrev: >>> For some reason Pixel's latest posts show up with a "Bad article >>> number" error. None of the content gets displayed. Besides the error >>> there is also a message saying the message may have expired. >>> >>> Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down the >>> pipes he shouldn't have? >> >> He works fine for me. > > Found a couple of workarounds. Turns out I can see his posts if I look > at the source of the post, they then appear in my Thunderbird. Pressing > reply however results in a blanc e-mail to Pixel, not a quoting reply > into Aglami. I haven't quite worked out if it's a Thunderbug or a > Motzerellabug. > > I wonder what will happen next time Pixel does something silly like > posting. Well let's hope we never live to see that day.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: ervaqre
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:56
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:56
12 lines
1207 bytes
1207 bytes
DG is a real pirate: | For some reason Pixel's latest posts show up with a "Bad article number" | error. None of the content gets displayed. Besides the error there is | also a message saying the message may have expired. | | Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down the | pipes he shouldn't have? Get a real newsreader! -- ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: ervaqre
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:58
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:58
10 lines
1071 bytes
1071 bytes
Sean is a real pirate: | > Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down the | > pipes he shouldn't have? | | He works fine for me. Get a real newsreader! -- ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:23
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:23
14 lines
1564 bytes
1564 bytes
ervaqre schreef: > Sean is a real pirate: > | > Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down the > | > pipes he shouldn't have? > | > | He works fine for me. > > Get a real newsreader! > I don't want a real newsreader. I've had to many bad experiences with the real mediaplayer. -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Far From Unique
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 18:30
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 18:30
24 lines
2079 bytes
2079 bytes
DG wrote: > ervaqre schreef: > > Sean is a real pirate: > > | > Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down the > > | > pipes he shouldn't have? > > | > > | He works fine for me. > > > > Get a real newsreader! > > > I don't want a real newsreader. I've had to many bad experiences with > the real mediaplayer. Hmm... I don't think I've ever seen that response to "Get a real newsreader" before. I like it. I too have had incredible amounts of trouble with Real(tm) products. Even Real(tm) cheese gives me problems, but that's probably just my lactose intolerance. So, to rot-13-reinder, I say: get a non-artificial newsreader! -- Aaron / Gaz This message brought to you by the council for obfuscating English.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: ervaqre
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 09:41
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 09:41
18 lines
1732 bytes
1732 bytes
Sne Sebz Havdhr vf n erny cvengr: | > V qba'g jnag n erny arjfernqre. V'ir unq gb znal onq rkcrevraprf jvgu | > gur erny zrqvncynlre. | | Uzz... V qba'g guvax V'ir rire frra gung erfcbafr gb "Trg n erny | arjfernqre" orsber. V yvxr vg. V gbb unir unq vaperqvoyr nzbhagf bs | gebhoyr jvgu Erny(gz) cebqhpgf. Rira Erny(gz) purrfr tvirf zr | ceboyrzf, ohg gung'f cebonoyl whfg zl ynpgbfr vagbyrenapr. V qba'g guvax gur Erny Uryvk Cynlre vf n onq cynlre npghnyyl. | Fb, gb ebg-13-ervaqre, V fnl: trg n aba-negvsvpvny arjfernqre! Zl arjfernqre'f abg negvsvpvny! Vg unf qverpg npprff gb gur enj onpxobar bs gur hfrarg! Va snpg, vg *vf* gur hfrarg. -- reinder, gur ybar hfrarg jnaqrere
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:55
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:55
18 lines
2080 bytes
2080 bytes
ervaqre schreef: > | Uzz... V qba'g guvax V'ir rire frra gung erfcbafr gb "Trg n erny > | arjfernqre" orsber. V yvxr vg. V gbb unir unq vaperqvoyr nzbhagf bs > | gebhoyr jvgu Erny(gz) cebqhpgf. Rira Erny(gz) purrfr tvirf zr > | ceboyrzf, ohg gung'f cebonoyl whfg zl ynpgbfr vagbyrenapr. > > V qba'g guvax gur Erny Uryvk Cynlre vf n onq cynlre npghnyyl. > > | Fb, gb ebg-13-ervaqre, V fnl: trg n aba-negvsvpvny arjfernqre! > > Zl arjfernqre'f abg negvsvpvny! Vg unf qverpg npprff gb gur enj onpxobar > bs gur hfrarg! Va snpg, vg *vf* gur hfrarg. > So it's your fault Pixel's last eight posts came through buggy. I should have known. When in doubt: blame the omnipotent one. -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: ervaqre
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:33
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:33
15 lines
1593 bytes
1593 bytes
QT vf n erny cvengr: | > I don't think the Real Helix Player is a bad player actually. | > | > | So, to rot-13-reinder, I say: get a non-artificial newsreader! | > | > My newsreader's not artificial! It has direct access to the raw backbone | > of the usenet! In fact, it *is* the usenet. | > | Fb vg'f lbhe snhyg Cvkry'f ynfg rvtug cbfgf pnzr guebhtu ohttl. V fubhyq | unir xabja. Jura va qbhog: oynzr gur bzavcbgrag bar. Trg n erny arjfernqre! -- reinder, gur ybar hfrarg jnaqrere
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:16
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:16
15 lines
1874 bytes
1874 bytes
ervaqre schreef: > | > My newsreader's not artificial! It has direct access to the raw backbone > | > of the usenet! In fact, it *is* the usenet. > | > > | Fb vg'f lbhe snhyg Cvkry'f ynfg rvtug cbfgf pnzr guebhtu ohttl. V fubhyq > | unir xabja. Jura va qbhog: oynzr gur bzavcbgrag bar. > > Trg n erny arjfernqre! > Spam! Spam! Spam! Reinder is pushing for the Real Newsreader again!!! -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: ervaqre
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:45
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:45
25 lines
1927 bytes
1927 bytes
QT vf n erny cvengr: | > Get a real newsreader! | > | Fcnz! Fcnz! Fcnz! | | Ervaqre vf chfuvat sbe gur Erny Arjfernqre ntnva!!! The other day I tried this newsreader on Linux called Pan. While not as good as Gravity, it did its job pretty well. Even that could perform magic tricks with ROT-13. So yes, get a real newsreader, not an email program that happens to have some usenet capabilities. Though, I guess those days are over. When I tried to find some information about Pan, I mostly found forums threads full of people asking how to add RSS feeds to this "newsreader". And even here in Aglami, few people use real newsreaders: Thunderbird: 3 Outlook Express: 2 Gravity: 1 Firefox: 1 Turnpike: 1 Agent: 1 -- reinder, gur ybar hfrarg jnaqrere
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:57
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:57
31 lines
2870 bytes
2870 bytes
ervaqre schreef: > The other day I tried this newsreader on Linux called Pan. While not as > good as Gravity, it did its job pretty well. Even that could perform > magic tricks with ROT-13. So yes, get a real newsreader, not an email > program that happens to have some usenet capabilities. Though, I guess > those days are over. When I tried to find some information about Pan, I > mostly found forums threads full of people asking how to add RSS feeds > to this "newsreader". And even here in Aglami, few people use real > newsreaders: > > Thunderbird: 3 > Outlook Express: 2 > Gravity: 1 > Firefox: 1 > Turnpike: 1 > Agent: 1 > I actually use the RSS function the most, then the e-mail function and usenet comes in last. And I've got too many silly little programs on my system as it is. Going to Linux isn't going to help that. It might be okay for 90% of my usage, it's that other 10% that keeps me locked in with Windows. Mainly games or crap other people use that probably can't do without some Microsoft thing like Windows, Office or even MSN. I know you can do a MSN chat on Linux. But does that include sound, video, winks and online games? Not that I'm so crazy about all that stuff, but most seem to dislike chatting to someone without all those trimmings. -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Daffy
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:49
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:49
31 lines
2295 bytes
2295 bytes
A day without ervaqre is like a day without sunshine... > | > Get a real newsreader! > | > > | Fcnz! Fcnz! Fcnz! > | > | Ervaqre vf chfuvat sbe gur Erny Arjfernqre ntnva!!! > > The other day I tried this newsreader on Linux called Pan. While not as > good as Gravity, it did its job pretty well. Even that could perform > magic tricks with ROT-13. So yes, get a real newsreader, not an email > program that happens to have some usenet capabilities. Though, I guess > those days are over. When I tried to find some information about Pan, I > mostly found forums threads full of people asking how to add RSS feeds > to this "newsreader". And even here in Aglami, few people use real > newsreaders: > > Thunderbird: 3 > Outlook Express: 2 > Gravity: 1 > Firefox: 1 > Turnpike: 1 > Agent: 1 > You're collecting stats? That has to be a good sign... -- Daffy Now it's your turn. aglami.net? What is that?
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Far From Unique
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:24
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:24
29 lines
2463 bytes
2463 bytes
On Sep 11, 2:45 am, ervaqre <m...@privacy.net> wrote: > QT vf n erny cvengr: > | > Get a real newsreader! > | > > | Fcnz! Fcnz! Fcnz! > | > | Ervaqre vf chfuvat sbe gur Erny Arjfernqre ntnva!!! > > The other day I tried this newsreader on Linux called Pan. While not as > good as Gravity, it did its job pretty well. Even that could perform > magic tricks with ROT-13. So yes, get a real newsreader, not an email > program that happens to have some usenet capabilities. Though, I guess > those days are over. When I tried to find some information about Pan, I > mostly found forums threads full of people asking how to add RSS feeds > to this "newsreader". And even here in Aglami, few people use real > newsreaders: > > Thunderbird: 3 > Outlook Express: 2 > Gravity: 1 > Firefox: 1 > Turnpike: 1 > Agent: 1 Google *roups: 1 -- Aaron / Gaz Just my 2% of a USD
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: ervaqre
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:43
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:43
14 lines
1511 bytes
1511 bytes
Far From Unique is a real pirate: | > Thunderbird: 3 | > Outlook Express: 2 | > Gravity: 1 | > Firefox: 1 | > Turnpike: 1 | > Agent: 1 | | Google *roups: 1 That was included with FireFox! -- ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: ervaqre
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:45
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:45
14 lines
1504 bytes
1504 bytes
Daffy is a real pirate: | > Thunderbird: 3 | > Outlook Express: 2 | > Gravity: 1 | > Firefox: 1 | > Turnpike: 1 | > Agent: 1 | > | You're collecting stats? That has to be a good sign... Hahahahahahaha!! Good one! -- ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: ervaqre
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:46
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:46
12 lines
1748 bytes
1748 bytes
DG is a real pirate: | I know you can do a MSN chat on Linux. But does that include sound, | video, winks and online games? Not that I'm so crazy about all that | stuff, but most seem to dislike chatting to someone without all those | trimmings. Don't worry, I ain't trying to convert you to Linux. I just wanted to make a remark about newsreaders. Oh, and am I the only person who abhors sound, video, winks and online games with MSN? -- ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:34
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:34
12 lines
2074 bytes
2074 bytes
ervaqre schreef: > > Don't worry, I ain't trying to convert you to Linux. I just wanted to > make a remark about newsreaders. Oh, and am I the only person who abhors > sound, video, winks and online games with MSN? > I do to, but it's a necessity with some people. Like youthful family members in the pre-writing stage. You can't blame a 4 year old for getting a kick out of a Schnappi wink. -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Rasmus Bøg Hansen
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:34
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:34
20 lines
2171 bytes
2171 bytes
DG <dammygerritsen@censored.zzn.com> hit the keyboard. Afterwards the following was on the screen: >> Sean is a real pirate: >> | > Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something >> down the | > pipes he shouldn't have? >> | | He works fine for me. >> >> Get a real newsreader! >> > I don't want a real newsreader. I've had to many bad experiences with > the real mediaplayer. Then get a false one! -- -- [ Rasmus "Møffe" Bøg Hansen ] ------------------------------------- It's a shame, but nowadays, I don't think you'll find anyone who doesn't know about 42 - even if that's *all* they know. ----------------------------------------------[ moffe at zz9 dot dk ] --
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Rasmus Bøg Hansen
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:35
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:35
31 lines
2865 bytes
2865 bytes
ervaqre <me@privacy.net> hit the keyboard. Afterwards the following was on the screen: > | > Get a real newsreader! > | > > | Fcnz! Fcnz! Fcnz! > | > | Ervaqre vf chfuvat sbe gur Erny Arjfernqre ntnva!!! > > The other day I tried this newsreader on Linux called Pan. While not as > good as Gravity, it did its job pretty well. Even that could perform > magic tricks with ROT-13. So yes, get a real newsreader, not an email > program that happens to have some usenet capabilities. Though, I guess > those days are over. When I tried to find some information about Pan, I > mostly found forums threads full of people asking how to add RSS feeds > to this "newsreader". And even here in Aglami, few people use real > newsreaders: > > Thunderbird: 3 > Outlook Express: 2 > Gravity: 1 > Firefox: 1 > Turnpike: 1 > Agent: 1 Gnus: 1 -- -- [ Rasmus "Møffe" Bøg Hansen ] ------------------------------------- Tell them we are not Gods but SysAdmins, which is the next best thing. ----------------------------------------------[ moffe at zz9 dot dk ] --
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:10
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:10
11 lines
1576 bytes
1576 bytes
Rasmus Bøg Hansen schreef: >> I don't want a real newsreader. I've had to many bad experiences with >> the real mediaplayer. > > Then get a false one! > According to Reinder I've already got a false one. But what does he know? He's stuck in a gravity well. -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Rasmus Bøg Hansen
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:41
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:41
19 lines
2206 bytes
2206 bytes
DG <dammygerritsen@censored.zzn.com> hit the keyboard.
Afterwards the following was on the screen:
>>> I don't want a real newsreader. I've had to many bad experiences with
>>> the real mediaplayer.
>>
>> Then get a false one!
>>
> According to Reinder I've already got a false one. But what does he
> know? He's stuck in a gravity well.
Do we have a bucket in the well or does the rope end with nothing?
--
-- [ Rasmus "Møffe" Bøg Hansen ] -------------------------------------
While Linux is larger than Emacs,
at least Linux has the excuse that it has to be.
--Linus Torvalds
----------------------------------------------[ moffe at zz9 dot dk ] --
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:22
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:22
12 lines
1703 bytes
1703 bytes
Rasmus Bøg Hansen schreef: >>> Then get a false one! >>> >> According to Reinder I've already got a false one. But what does he >> know? He's stuck in a gravity well. > > Do we have a bucket in the well or does the rope end with nothing? > You'd have to ask him. I'm not going down there. -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Rasmus Bøg Hansen
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:59
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:59
23 lines
2481 bytes
2481 bytes
DG <dammygerritsen@censored.zzn.com> hit the keyboard.
Afterwards the following was on the screen:
>>>> Then get a false one!
>>>>
>>> According to Reinder I've already got a false one. But what does he
>>> know? He's stuck in a gravity well.
>>
>> Do we have a bucket in the well or does the rope end with nothing?
>>
> You'd have to ask him. I'm not going down there.
We could drop a message bottle with a note inside.
Well, of course there must be a note inside a message bottle,
otherwise it wouldnøt be a message bottle.
--
-- [ Rasmus "Møffe" Bøg Hansen ] -------------------------------------
God put me on earth to accomplish a certain number of things.
Right now I am so far behind I will never die.
-Bill Waterson, Calvin and Hobbes
----------------------------------------------[ moffe at zz9 dot dk ] --
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 18:23
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 18:23
14 lines
1880 bytes
1880 bytes
Rasmus Bøg Hansen schreef: >>> Do we have a bucket in the well or does the rope end with nothing? >>> >> You'd have to ask him. I'm not going down there. > > We could drop a message bottle with a note inside. > > Well, of course there must be a note inside a message bottle, > otherwise it wouldnøt be a message bottle. > Unless you'd want to indicate "I'm not talking to you any more." -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: ervaqre
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:07
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:07
10 lines
1727 bytes
1727 bytes
DG is a real pirate: | I do to, but it's a necessity with some people. Like youthful family | members in the pre-writing stage. You can't blame a 4 year old for | getting a kick out of a Schnappi wink. You can't blame the 4 year old, but you can blame the parents for not giving him a proper raising. Cold rum and old goat bread I say. -- ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: ervaqre
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:08
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:08
8 lines
1448 bytes
1448 bytes
Rasmus Bøg Hansen is a real pirate: | Gnus: 1 I need to try that out someday, even though it doesn't seem to be able to thread threads all over the screen. -- ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Rasmus Bøg Hansen
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:21
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:21
18 lines
2312 bytes
2312 bytes
ervaqre <me@privacy.net> hit the keyboard.
Afterwards the following was on the screen:
> DG is a real pirate:
> | > Well, of course there must be a note inside a message bottle,
> | > otherwise it wouldnøt be a message bottle.
> | >
> | Unless you'd want to indicate "I'm not talking to you any more."
>
> :(
Did you receive many bottles without messages?
--
-- [ Rasmus "Møffe" Bøg Hansen ] -------------------------------------
Stop the trolling. Make code, not war.
- Dana Lacoste
----------------------------------------------[ moffe at zz9 dot dk ] --
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Rasmus Bøg Hansen
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:28
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:28
18 lines
2692 bytes
2692 bytes
ervaqre <me@privacy.net> hit the keyboard.
Afterwards the following was on the screen:
> | I do to, but it's a necessity with some people. Like youthful family
> | members in the pre-writing stage. You can't blame a 4 year old for
> | getting a kick out of a Schnappi wink.
>
> You can't blame the 4 year old, but you can blame the parents for not
> giving him a proper raising. Cold rum and old goat bread I say.
Salted pork!
--
-- [ Rasmus "Møffe" Bøg Hansen ] -------------------------------------
Only wimps use tape backup: real men just upload their important stuff
on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)
-- Linus Torvalds
----------------------------------------------[ moffe at zz9 dot dk ] --
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:32
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:32
8 lines
1950 bytes
1950 bytes
ervaqre schreef: > You can't blame the 4 year old, but you can blame the parents for not > giving him a proper raising. Cold rum and old goat bread I say. > Now you've got me feeling sorry for the old goat. -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:32
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:32
12 lines
1780 bytes
1780 bytes
ervaqre schreef: > | > Well, of course there must be a note inside a message bottle, > | > otherwise it wouldnøt be a message bottle. > | > > | Unless you'd want to indicate "I'm not talking to you any more." > > :( > :p -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:36
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:36
14 lines
1918 bytes
1918 bytes
Rasmus Bøg Hansen schreef: >> | > Well, of course there must be a note inside a message bottle, >> | > otherwise it wouldnøt be a message bottle. >> | > >> | Unless you'd want to indicate "I'm not talking to you any more." >> >> :( > > Did you receive many bottles without messages? > I bet they're littered around the floor at his place. -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Rasmus Bøg Hansen
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:49
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:49
15 lines
2313 bytes
2313 bytes
ervaqre <me@privacy.net> hit the keyboard. Afterwards the following was on the screen: > | Gnus: 1 > > I need to try that out someday, even though it doesn't seem to be > able to thread threads all over the screen. If you use all the screen for threads, you don't have any room for monkey porn. -- -- [ Rasmus "Møffe" Bøg Hansen ] ------------------------------------- Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers ----------------------------------------------[ moffe at zz9 dot dk ] --
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Rasmus Bøg Hansen
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:42
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:42
20 lines
2415 bytes
2415 bytes
DG <dammygerritsen@censored.zzn.com> hit the keyboard.
Afterwards the following was on the screen:
>>> | > Well, of course there must be a note inside a message bottle,
>>> | > otherwise it wouldnøt be a message bottle.
>>> | > | Unless you'd want to indicate "I'm not talking to you any
>>> more."
>>>
>>> :(
>>
>> Did you receive many bottles without messages?
>>
> I bet they're littered around the floor at his place.
I know the feeling.
--
-- [ Rasmus "Møffe" Bøg Hansen ] -------------------------------------
if (!strcmp(getenv(EDITOR), "vi")) {karma++};
----------------------------------------------[ moffe at zz9 dot dk ] --
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Pixel "#~
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:26
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:26
26 lines
1891 bytes
1891 bytes
Earlier DG muttered: >For some reason Pixel's latest posts show up with a "Bad article number" > error. None of the content gets displayed. Besides the error there is >also a message saying the message may have expired. > >Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down the >pipes he shouldn't have? I am innocent, and certainly not spamming! And it can't be my robust dear pentium windows 95 computer. The fault must be on your side, for sure! -- pixel - knight of aglami www.warande.net/~pixel pixel at aglami dot net msn: johannesvanderwerf at hotmail dot com icq: 58550811 www.aglami.net - "This is the captain. We have a little problem with our entry sequence, so we may experience some slight... turbulence and then explode." -
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Pixel "#~
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:27
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:27
28 lines
2132 bytes
2132 bytes
Earlier ervaqre muttered: >mostly found forums threads full of people asking how to add RSS feeds >to this "newsreader". And even here in Aglami, few people use real >newsreaders: > >Thunderbird: 3 >Outlook Express: 2 >Gravity: 1 >Firefox: 1 >Turnpike: 1 >Agent: 1 Agent rules man! Don't let Gravity keep you down! -- pixel - knight of aglami www.warande.net/~pixel pixel at aglami dot net msn: johannesvanderwerf at hotmail dot com icq: 58550811 www.aglami.net - "This is the captain. We have a little problem with our entry sequence, so we may experience some slight... turbulence and then explode." -
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:10
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:10
17 lines
1781 bytes
1781 bytes
Pixel "#~ schreef: >> For some reason Pixel's latest posts show up with a "Bad article number" >> error. None of the content gets displayed. Besides the error there is >> also a message saying the message may have expired. >> >> Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down the >> pipes he shouldn't have? > > I am innocent, and certainly not spamming! > And it can't be my robust dear pentium windows 95 computer. > > The fault must be on your side, for sure! > Some problems magically correct themselves. Others are called Pixel. -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:11
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:11
21 lines
2067 bytes
2067 bytes
Pixel "#~ schreef: >> mostly found forums threads full of people asking how to add RSS feeds >> to this "newsreader". And even here in Aglami, few people use real >> newsreaders: >> >> Thunderbird: 3 >> Outlook Express: 2 >> Gravity: 1 >> Firefox: 1 >> Turnpike: 1 >> Agent: 1 > > Agent rules man! Don't let Gravity keep you down! > > You don't have anything until you have TB. Now doesn't that sound Pixellian? -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Rasmus Bøg Hansen
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:07
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:07
24 lines
2385 bytes
2385 bytes
DG <dammygerritsen@censored.zzn.com> hit the keyboard. Afterwards the following was on the screen: >>> For some reason Pixel's latest posts show up with a "Bad article >>> number" error. None of the content gets displayed. Besides the >>> error there is also a message saying the message may have expired. >>> >>> Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down >>> the pipes he shouldn't have? >> >> I am innocent, and certainly not spamming! >> And it can't be my robust dear pentium windows 95 computer. >> >> The fault must be on your side, for sure! >> > Some problems magically correct themselves. Others are called Pixel. My monitor claims to have 1764000 of them. It is terrible! -- -- [ Rasmus "Møffe" Bøg Hansen ] ------------------------------------- Expect the unexpected. - HitchHikers Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams ----------------------------------------------[ moffe at zz9 dot dk ] --
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Rasmus Bøg Hansen
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:08
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:08
20 lines
2228 bytes
2228 bytes
"Pixel \"#~" <Jjwweerrff@phil.uu.nl> hit the keyboard. Afterwards the following was on the screen: >>For some reason Pixel's latest posts show up with a "Bad article number" >> error. None of the content gets displayed. Besides the error there is >>also a message saying the message may have expired. >> >>Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down the >>pipes he shouldn't have? > > I am innocent, and certainly not spamming! > And it can't be my robust dear pentium windows 95 computer. You should switch to Pixel OS. -- -- [ Rasmus "Møffe" Bøg Hansen ] ------------------------------------- If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions? ----------------------------------------------[ moffe at zz9 dot dk ] --
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:56
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:56
14 lines
1641 bytes
1641 bytes
Rasmus Bøg Hansen schreef: >>> I am innocent, and certainly not spamming! >>> And it can't be my robust dear pentium windows 95 computer. >>> >>> The fault must be on your side, for sure! >>> >> Some problems magically correct themselves. Others are called Pixel. > > My monitor claims to have 1764000 of them. It is terrible! > How many dead Pixels have you got? -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: ervaqre
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:33
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:33
18 lines
1962 bytes
1962 bytes
Pixel \"#~ is a real pirate: >>mostly found forums threads full of people asking how to add RSS feeds >>to this "newsreader". And even here in Aglami, few people use real >>newsreaders: >> >>Thunderbird: 3 >>Outlook Express: 2 >>Gravity: 1 >>Firefox: 1 >>Turnpike: 1 >>Agent: 1 > > Agent rules man! Don't let Gravity keep you down! Using Agent is like selling your soul to capitalism! -- ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: ervaqre
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:34
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:34
11 lines
1836 bytes
1836 bytes
DG is a real pirate: >> Agent rules man! Don't let Gravity keep you down! >> > You don't have anything until you have TB. > > Now doesn't that sound Pixellian? Unfortunately TB has become extremely bloated :( -- ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: DG
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:45
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:45
14 lines
2036 bytes
2036 bytes
ervaqre schreef: >>> Agent rules man! Don't let Gravity keep you down! >>> >> You don't have anything until you have TB. >> >> Now doesn't that sound Pixellian? > > Unfortunately TB has become extremely bloated :( > It's still much better than OE. And it eliminates the need for online rss-readers or a standalone one. -- Danny.
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Pixel
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:42
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:42
28 lines
1988 bytes
1988 bytes
Earlier Rasmus Bøg Hansen muttered: >>>For some reason Pixel's latest posts show up with a "Bad article number" >>> error. None of the content gets displayed. Besides the error there is >>>also a message saying the message may have expired. >>> >>>Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down the >>>pipes he shouldn't have? >> >> I am innocent, and certainly not spamming! >> And it can't be my robust dear pentium windows 95 computer. > >You should switch to Pixel OS. I've lost my registration code. -- pixel - knight of aglami www.whitefall.nl/johannes msn: johannesvanderwerf at hotmail dot com icq: 58550811 www.aglami.net - "This is the captain. We have a little problem with our entry sequence, so we may experience some slight... turbulence and then explode." -
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Daffy
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:37
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:37
18 lines
1685 bytes
1685 bytes
A day without Pixel "#~ is like a day without sunshine... >>>> For some reason Pixel's latest posts show up with a "Bad article number" >>>> error. None of the content gets displayed. Besides the error there is >>>> also a message saying the message may have expired. >>>> >>>> Did Pixel crash the internets again after stuffing something down the >>>> pipes he shouldn't have? >>> I am innocent, and certainly not spamming! >>> And it can't be my robust dear pentium windows 95 computer. >> You should switch to Pixel OS. > > I've lost my registration code. > > It's only twice the original purchase price to get a new one. -- Daffy
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: ervaqre
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:40
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:40
9 lines
1447 bytes
1447 bytes
Daffy is a real pirate: >> I've lost my registration code. >> > It's only twice the original purchase price to get a new one. Ha! Send me an email for a crack! -- ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Pixel "#~
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:42
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:42
21 lines
1777 bytes
1777 bytes
Earlier ervaqre muttered: >Daffy is a real pirate: >>> >> It's only twice the original purchase price to get a new one. > >Ha! Send me an email for a crack! Send me the hack!! -- pixel - knight of aglami www.whitefall.nl/johannes msn: johannesvanderwerf at hotmail dot com icq: 58550811 www.aglami.net - "This is the captain. We have a little problem with our entry sequence, so we may experience some slight... turbulence and then explode." -
Re: Pixel is Spam? [OT]
Author: Pixel "#~
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:44
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:44
27 lines
1929 bytes
1929 bytes
Earlier Pixel "#~ muttered: >Earlier ervaqre muttered: > >>Daffy is a real pirate: >>>> >>> It's only twice the original purchase price to get a new one. >> >>Ha! Send me an email for a crack! > >Send me the hack!! Oh, damn. I haven't configured a proper smtp server in my agent. -- pixel - knight of aglami www.whitefall.nl/johannes msn: johannesvanderwerf at hotmail dot com icq: 58550811 www.aglami.net - "This is the captain. We have a little problem with our entry sequence, so we may experience some slight... turbulence and then explode." -
Page 1 of 2 ⢠56 total messages
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads