🚀 go-pugleaf

metro-golden-meower wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:22:25 +0000 (UTC), Tim Weaver
> <tmw9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:58:09 +0000 (UTC), Tim Weaver
>>> <tmw9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> why don't you come over to the flonk? i had a look in the monkey ng
>>>>> and its kind of dying. you obviously have a  sence of humour and i
>>>>> think you'd have fun over here. 
>>>>
>>>>You can't say "over here" when he's reading this "over there".  If he
>>>>tried to read this over here while being over there at the same time,
>>>>the universe will blow up. 
>>> 
>>> more like your thin skull will implode. he's not stupid and knows i'm
>>> not a reg in the monkey ng and by the power of deductive reasoning,
>>> will realize i am in the other ng in the x-post line and  not the 
>>> invisible one noone can see or find unless they have special glasses.
>>> so... NEENER NEENER. 
>>
>>Your logic is flawed by the use of "see" and "special glasses" in your 
>>proof.  I have striken it from the record. 
> 
> really? how come you didn't contest the invisible ng as well? hmmm?
> hmmm?

Why should I?  I have nothing against invisible newsgroups.  Are an 
invisible newsgroup nazi?  Perhaps you have a beef with all things 
invisible?

>>And what do you have against thin skulls? Are you a Neanderthal?
> 
> they're not as satisfying to crack as thick ones which take some skill
> and effort.

Oh, that's bass ackwards, my friend.  Neanderthal skulls are thick and very 
hard to crack.  You can thump a modern day skull and the result is the bald 
guy from SCANNERS.
-- 
Tim Weaver

I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.