Article View: alt.games.duke3d
Article #78231Re: Question about Duke Nukem in general.
From: Repository Bloke
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:00
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:00
41 lines
3091 bytes
3091 bytes
"Sionnach" wrote: <snip> > Perhaps you've simply spent too much time fielding posts from immature > eejits, but having someone jump to an unsupported (and insulting) > conclusion - and continue the leap to land on me with both feet - really > bothered me; ESPECIALLY since I had specifically logged on to say "thanks" > for the information. Just goes to show really that usenet can be a harsh place when others are not aware of your intentions. I've already apologised for my outburst, I accept it was unwarranted. Yes I jumped to what may seem to you to be an illogical conclusion, but when you've been around and dealt with a good deal of people as I have you'd be surprised at exactly how many of them are trying to get the game (or any any game, for that matter) for nothing. Insulting you was never the intention - letting you know that, if you had not actually got the game, that you weren't welcome here - was. > at this point I'm leery of asking for any more help from this group By all means ask. The attitude of one doesn't necessarily represent those of others. I flew off the handle - it happens. > BTW- I do have it up and running. Good! > However, I was correct in thinking that in order to have the PPak work > with the port, it has to be *installed*- there's no GRP file, rather, in > installation it patches the original version of Duke. Ah well, that actually makes more sense. I didn't realise (you never actually said?) you were trying to patch the game with the PPak. In which case the original game would *have* to be already installed for the patch to do its work. I concede that you are correct... *grin* I've only ever bought v1.3d and the Atomic Edition, hence my natural assumption. JonoF's port works with just the GRP file from both of them - which is why I couldn't understand your difficulty. - Kim
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<40f0f383$0$18668$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!border2.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<0p60e0lpbr6sp7uf52e1i3tj1jhp1gkuv8@4ax.com> <pUYDc.4069$G2.2046@fe39.usenetserver.com> <2kvto1F73h21U1@uni-berlin.de> <10eof314qjd8dd1@corp.supernews.com> <2l38vlF88b63U1@uni-berlin.de> <40ed2bee$0$25460$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <2l5bnaF8gf4sU1@uni-berlin.de> <40edfd46$0$16107$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <2lahaiFahj0qU1@uni-berlin.de> <2lbr4rFavlf1U1@uni-berlin.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!border2.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail From: "Repository Bloke" <robinsonzoospam@optusnet.com.au> Newsgroups: alt.games.duke3d References: <0p60e0lpbr6sp7uf52e1i3tj1jhp1gkuv8@4ax.com> <pUYDc.4069$G2.2046@fe39.usenetserver.com> <2kvto1F73h21U1@uni-berlin.de> <10eof314qjd8dd1@corp.supernews.com> <2l38vlF88b63U1@uni-berlin.de> <40ed2bee$0$25460$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <2l5bnaF8gf4sU1@uni-berlin.de> <40edfd46$0$16107$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <2lahaiFahj0qU1@uni-berlin.de> <2lbr4rFavlf1U1@uni-berlin.de> Subject: Re: Question about Duke Nukem in general. Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:00:06 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Lines: 43 Message-ID: <40f0f383$0$18668$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: 211.31.124.96 X-Trace: 1089532803 18668 211.31.124.96 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit